arXiv AI

How Reliable Are Large Language Models for Soil Organic Carbon Assessment? An Australian Benchmark

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Monte Carlo-Based Ex-Ante Assessment of the Green Benefits of an AI-Driven Smart Agriculture Platform in Hainan

The paper presents a Monte Carlo-based framework to quantify the green benefits of an AI-driven smart agriculture platform in Hainan. By integrating large-language-model question answering, multimodal pest diagnosis, IoT sensing, satellite remote sensing, and a closed-loop field record system, the study builds a cradle-to-farm-gate carbon accounting model and simulates three crop scenarios (mango, winter vegetable, rice). Results show median reductions of 23.5% in pesticide use, 21.0% in fertilizer, 16.5% in irrigation water, and 21.5% in carbon intensity, with high probabilities for fertilizer and carbon reductions but lower for water savings.

By Zhaoyang Li, Ruijie Zhang, Zhaoji Sun, Lu Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

Spectroscopy Analysis with Machine Learning Regression for the Quantification of Carbon and Nitrogen Contents in Inceptisol and Oxisol Soil Types: Comparing Different Preprocessing and Validation methods as well as Feature Importance

arXiv:2607. 00834v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Near-Infrared (NIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional soil analysis methods, offering advantages such as speed, low cost, and non-destructive testing.

By Vinicius Herique Kieling, Guilherme Macedo Baggio, Felipe Augusto Bueno Rossi, Marco Antonio de Castro Barbosa, Dalcimar Casanova, Larissa Macedo dos Santos Tonial, Jefferson Tales Oliva
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Sensitivity Analysis of Decision Rules in an Agent-Based Agro-Ecological Model

The paper presents a new method for sensitivity analysis of decision rules in an agent‑based agro‑ecological model. It treats the decision structure as a hierarchical design space, using a random‑forest‑supervised HSIC‑ANOVA to rank main effects and interactions across both categorical and numerical variables. The approach is applied to outputs such as nitrogen leaching, soil organic carbon variation, and yield predictions, providing an interpretable, decision‑oriented analysis.

By Benjamin Pianet, Baptiste Lesquoy, Paul Saves, Benoit Gaudou, Jean Villerd, Nicolas Verstaevel, Olivier Therond
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Simulating the Marginal Green Contribution of AI Modules in a Smart-Agriculture Platform: Evidence from Two Monte Carlo Experiments

The paper evaluates the green benefits of individual AI modules within a smart‑agriculture platform through two Monte Carlo simulations. In Experiment 1, AI diagnosis significantly increases the likelihood of reducing pesticide and fertilizer use compared to traditional extension services, with up to a 49 % probability of a 20 % pesticide reduction when accuracy and adoption are high. Experiment 2 shows that adding AI irrigation scheduling to IoT‑based engineering yields a 5 percentage‑point increase in median water savings and a 30.5 % reduction in paddy methane emissions, while farmer adoption remains the key limiting factor for achieving green targets.

By Zhaoyang Li, Ruijie Zhang, Zhaoji Sun, Lu Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 15

AgriJev: Efficient Agricultural Candidate Scoring with Multi-Scale Adapted Models

AgriJev is a family of adapted Qwen3.5 models (0.8B, 2B, 4B, and 9B) designed for efficient agricultural candidate scoring. The models use a shared interface that conditions on agricultural text, a judgment question, and candidate definitions to return scores and relative probabilities in a single forward pass. Across 17 external test views, AgriJev-9B achieves 75.44% mean accuracy, surpassing both the original Qwen3.5 and matched agricultural SFT models, while also offering roughly half the median scoring latency of equivalent answer‑generation models on an A100 GPU.

By Xuechen Li (University of Minnesota Twin Cities)
arXiv AI
Jun 12

GeoNatureAgent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Environmental Geospatial Analysis Across Frontier and Open-Weight Foundation Models

arXiv:2606. 12821v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Environmental scientists spend disproportionate effort on data wrangling rather than analysis, and AI agents that automate geospatial workflows remain unvalidated: no benchmark evaluates agents operating through structured tool calling against real APIs.

By Gabriel Diaz-Ireland, Diego Prieto-Herr\'aez, Mario Garc\'ia Peces, Javier Vel\'azquez, Devika Jain
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Beyond State-of-the-Art: Standardising Environmental Impact Metrics for AI Research

The paper highlights that as Large Language Models grow in capability and prevalence, their environmental footprint is increasing, yet the machine learning community lacks standardized carbon accounting practices. An automated review of 5,285 NeurIPS 2025 papers shows almost no reporting of environmental impact. To address this, the authors propose standardized sustainability metrics for training efficiency, heuristics for estimating inference carbon costs, a software tool called carbonbenchmark for tracking emissions, and the SMAJ framework to encourage prioritizing computational efficiency and environmental accountability over marginal accuracy gains.

By Lachlan McGinness, Dan Pagendam, Robert Offner