arXiv AI

StackTok: Accelerating VLMs Inference with Budget-Adaptive Visual Token Selection

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

CatchUp: Depth-Aware Re-Admission of Visual Tokens for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models

CatchUp is a training‑free framework that improves efficiency in large vision‑language models by depth‑aware re‑admission of visual tokens. It repeatedly evaluates query‑conditioned relevance, processes only selected tokens per decoder interval, and preserves deferred tokens for later re‑admission, using reference‑to‑current transition signals to approximate missed representation evolution. Experiments on three referring‑expression grounding datasets and six multimodal benchmarks show that CatchUp retains over 92% of full‑model performance with 88.9% fewer active tokens and reduces end‑to‑end latency by 8.0% at a 64‑token budget.

By Eunju Park, Uiwon Hwang
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

QCPruner: Query-Conditioned Population Coverage for Visual Token Pruning

QCPruner is a training‑free visual token pruning method that conditions both token selection and representation on the query via bilateral utility weighting. It fuses keyword‑matched query anchors with cross‑modal cues to compute a nonnegative facility‑location objective that is monotone and submodular, guaranteeing a (1‑1/e) greedy approximation. Across multiple multimodal large language models, QCPruner consistently outperforms existing pruning methods, achieving over 96% of unpruned performance even with very few tokens retained.

By Shengli He (Guizhou University), Yongchao Liang (Guizhou University), Roumeng He (Shanghai Ocean University), Junjie Zeng (Guizhou University), Jiyuan He (Guizhou University), Can Wu (Guizhou University), Li Zheng (Guizhou University)
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 1

MiCo: Mutual Information Coverage Optimization through Semantic Erasure Modeling for Efficient MLLM Inference

arXiv:2609.34330v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in multimodal understanding, but processing large numbers of visu...

By Tinghao Wang, Yichen Guo, Qizhe Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Weimin Ouyang, Rui Huang, Jiajun Cao, Sixiang Chen, Hao Jiang, Jixian Wu, Zheng Lu, Bofan Zhu, Renyuan Li, Shanghang Zhang
arXiv AI
6d ago

LearnPrunerV2: Learnable Progressive Token Pruning for Vision-Language Models

LearnPrunerV2 is a fully learnable token‑pruning framework for Vision‑Language Models that replaces heuristic pruning with lightweight modules in every backbone layer. These modules estimate token importance by combining visual saliency and query relevance via a shadow token, revealing a consistent staircase redundancy pattern across layers. The method introduces Budget‑Deterministic Pruning to set fixed per‑layer budgets, achieving state‑of‑the‑art efficiency while preserving 99.8% of performance even after pruning 77.8% of visual tokens on LLaVA‑v1.5.

By Rinyoichi Takezoe, Yaqian Li, Weiren Wang, Zihao Bo, Huihong Shi, Anzhou Hou, Mo Guang, Jiale Yan, Kaiwen Long
arXiv AI
Jun 11

AVIS: Adaptive Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2606. 11576v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) benefit from chain-of-thought prompting and test-time scaling, but these gains often come with prohibitive inference cost due to large visual contexts and long decoding chains.

By Ahmadreza Jeddi, Minh Ngoc Le, Amirhossein Kazerouni, Hakki Can Karaimer, Hue Nguyen, Iqbal Mohomed, Michael Brudno, Alex Levinshtein, Konstantinos G. Derpanis, Babak Taati, Radek Grzeszczuk
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Who Speaks for the Pruned? Visual Token Pruning as Coverage Optimization

CoverPruner is a training‑free visual token pruner that reframes token pruning as a representational coverage maximization problem. Instead of selecting which tokens to keep, it asks which surviving token best represents each removed token for a vision‑language model. Experiments on various VLM architectures show that CoverPruner consistently outperforms existing methods, especially under high compression rates.

By Qingchan Zhu, Weihang You, Hanqi Jiang, Changdi Yang, Tianming Liu, Geng Yuan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 6

Do All Visual Tokens Matter Equally? Object-Evidence Preserving Token Merging for Vision-Language Retrieval

Multi-vector vision-language retrieval preserves fine-grained visual evidence through maximum-similarity late interaction, but dense image-side tokens make storage and scoring expensive. Existing token compression methods reduce this cost, yet they can remove or collapse object- and region-level evidence that future query tokens may need to select.

arXiv AI
Aug 11

Not All Visual Tokens Are Equally Safe to Remove:Consequence-Sensitive Visual Token Compression

arXiv:2608. 09176v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual token compression for vision--language models (VLMs) has largely relied on criteria such as attention, redundancy, and uncertainty to maximize average accuracy under a fixed compute budget, implicitly assuming that all errors carry equal cost.

By Jingbo Wen, Liang He, Mingyu Cao, Haoyu Wang, Minxuan Hu, Kangning Cui, Xilu Wang