arXiv:2606. 14003v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Determining the crystal structure of a material from its powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern is a central challenge in materials science.
By Nofit Segal, Mingda Li, Benjamin Kurt Miller, Rafael G\'omez-Bombarelli
XDecomposer is a prior‑free framework that jointly decomposes and identifies multiphase X‑ray diffraction patterns without requiring candidate phase lists, structural templates, or knowledge of the number of phases. It treats multiphase analysis as a set prediction problem, inferring an unordered set of phase‑resolved components, their mixture proportions, and structural representations within a single architecture. Experiments on simulated and experimental data demonstrate improved reconstruction accuracy and phase identification across diverse chemical systems, with strong generalization to unseen mixtures.
By Hanyu Gao, Bin Cao, Yunyue Su, Tong-Yi Zhang, Qiang Liu
arXiv:2608. 06448v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recovering a periodic 3D crystal structure from sparse, unindexed electron diffraction (ED) observations is a challenging generative inverse problem.
By Germain Poloudenny, Ya\"el Fr\'egier, Arnaud Demorti\`ere
PXtal is a new framework that learns aligned representations for powder X‑ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns and crystal structures, addressing the information asymmetry inherent in compressing 3D crystal data into 1D diffraction patterns. It employs Unbalanced Optimal Transport to adjust cross‑modal coupling and uses a coupling‑level generalized Kullback‑Leibler divergence to supervise the transport plan. Across six test sets—including four zero‑shot transfer scenarios—PXtal consistently outperforms baseline models in retrieving crystal candidates from PXRD data, especially when similar diffraction patterns correspond to distinct crystals, and its encoders transfer effectively to downstream materials science tasks.
By Zhuoran Yang, Christopher M. Collins, Bei Peng, Luke M. Daniels, Matthew J. Rosseinsky, Vladimir V. Gusev
arXiv:2610.33310v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) is the primary high-throughput method for resolving crystal structures, a cornerstone of materials science. As high-th...
By Ming-Chiang Chang, Brian DeCost
arXiv:2607. 08470v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fully characterizing a crystalline material requires integrating heterogeneous data sources -- atomic structures, diffraction patterns, electronic density of states, and natural language -- each of which captures a different facet of the same physical object.
By Le Yang (Institute for Advanced Simulations), Anoop K. Chandran (J\"ulich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum J\"ulich), Jona \"Ostreicher (Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Evgenii Sovetkin (J\"ulich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum J\"ulich), Adrian Mirza (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin f\"ur Materialien und Energie, Helmholtz Institute for Polymers in Energy Applications Jena), Sebastien Bompas (Institute for Advanced Simulations), Bashir Kazimi (Institute for Advanced Simulations), Pascal Friederich (Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Stefan Kesselheim (J\"ulich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum J\"ulich, 1. Physikalisches Institut, University of Cologne), Kevin Maik Jablonka (Helmholtz Institute for Polymers in Energy Applications Jena, Center for Energy and Environmental Chemistry Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena), Stefan Sandfeld (Institute for Advanced Simulations, Faculty 5 - Georesources and Materials Engineering, RWTH Aachen University)
The paper introduces CG-OMatG, an equivariant Riemannian flow-based generative model that predicts molecular crystal structures using a coarse-grained, hierarchical representation. It treats molecules as rigid bodies, performs inter- and intra-molecular message passing, and learns to reconstruct molecule centroids, orientations, and lattice parameters conditioned on chemical species and conformer geometry. The model is trained on OMC25 and CSD datasets, fine-tuned with policy gradient reinforcement learning to favor low-energy structures, and validated against a CSP blind test benchmark using COMPACK packing-similarity analysis.
By Thomas Egg, Harry Winston Sullivan, Maya M. Martirossyan, Philipp H\"ollmer, Cheng Zeng, Adrian Roitberg, Mingjie Liu, Richard Hennig, Sapna Sarupria, Ellad B. Tadmor, Stefano Martiniani
arXiv:2505. 12650v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reconstructing atomistic crystal structures from a single noisy STEM projection is an ill-posed inverse problem: multiple lattices can explain similar contrast, and purely feed-forward models cannot verify physical validity.
By Yaotian Yang, Yiwen Tang, Yizhe Chen, Xiao Chen, Jiangjie Qiu, Hao Xiong, Haoyu Yin, Zhiyao Luo, Yifei Zhang, Sijia Tao, Wentao Li, Qinghua Zhang, Yuqiang Li, Wanli Ouyang, Bin Zhao, Xiaonan Wang, Fei Wei
arXiv:2602. 17176v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Crystal structure prediction (CSP), which aims to predict the 3D atomic arrangement of a crystal from its composition, is central to materials discovery and mechanistic understanding.
By Jinming Mu, Lixin He, Xudong Zhu, Shi Yin
arXiv:2610.27762v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep generative modeling has achieved remarkable progress in crystal generation. Given the rich symmetries inherent in crystalline structures, recent w...
By Ziqiao Meng, Rongsheng Chen, Zhi Zheng, Nikita Kazeev, Zhenkun Wang, Andrey Ustyuzhanin, Wee Sun Lee
AutoXRD is an autonomous large language model (LLM) agent framework designed to automate powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis by structuring the process as stepwise refinement, grounding actions in observed evidence, and applying deterministic crystallographic and physical checks. The authors introduce XRDBench, comprising two tracks: XRDBench-QA with 100 diagnostic tasks focused on scientific reasoning, and XRDBench-E2E with 34 executable workflows that test full analysis capabilities, including file inspection, software execution, iterative refinement, evidence preservation, and reporting. Evaluation of ten recent LLMs on 1,340 model–task runs shows average scores of 57.8, with GPT‑5.6 Sol achieving the highest overall score of 81.1; the study also identifies key failure modes such as coupled‑parameter control and quantitative reasoning, highlighting areas for future improvement.
By Yuetong Wu, Maojun Sun
The study benchmarks 12 deep generative crystal structure prediction models against the template-based TCSP 2.0 on 180 test structures, finding that template retrieval achieves the highest top‑1 success (68.3%). Most generative predictions overlap with template substitutions, and removing entire stoichiometric prototype families from training reduces accuracy by 50‑78%, indicating strong prototype dependence. Only a small subset of predictions remain after such removal, suggesting limited genuine de‑novo capability.
By Lai Wei, Rongzhi Dong, Ying Feng, Madeline Miklos, Jianjun Hu