arXiv:2504. 21259v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Accurate imputation of race and ethnicity (R&E) is essential for fair lending compliance under ECOA, HMDA, and the Community Reinvestment Act, where up to 15% of mortgage applications carry missing race data and regulated institutions bear responsibility for identifying disparities on those records.
By S. Chalavadi, A. Pastor, T. Leitch
arXiv:2606. 28345v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-governed social robots increasingly decide who receives real-world assistance first.
By Carmen Ng, Gjergji Kasneci
arXiv:2607. 26348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as synthetic users, stand-ins for human respondents whose simulated answers feed product, policy, and market decisions.
By Zihan Chen, Di Zhu, Lei Nico Zheng
arXiv:2605. 12530v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM fairness should be evaluated through in-situ behavioral pattern rather than standardized-test Q&A benchmarks.
By Zeyu Tang, Sang T. Truong, Deonna Owens, Shreyas Sharma, Yibo Jacky Zhang, Brando Miranda, Sanmi Koyejo
arXiv:2607. 16232v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The growing use of statistical learning algorithms to infer human preferences from high-dimensional choice data runs up against a fundamental challenge: choice alternatives typically differ in many ways simultaneously, so it is generally unclear which factors actually drove an observed decision and should be credited as preferences.
By Zachary Wojtowicz, Ayush Nayak, Jacob Andreas
arXiv:2606. 22974v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent work on preference elicitation in large language models (LLMs) has demonstrated that, when given a series of choices between two outcomes, LLMs reveal a coherent, model-specific utility structure.
By Yujun Zhou, Christopher M. Ackerman
arXiv:2605. 23234v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Assessing the spatial fairness of predictive models involves establishing whether they are statistically penalizing (favoring) individuals associated with certain geographical locations.
By Francesco Lettich, Mario A. Nascimento, Chiara Pugliese, Chiara Renso
arXiv:2607. 24341v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent studies use Large language models (LLMs) to simulate human opinions and decisions by prompting models with demographic, attitudinal, or persona-based descriptions.
By Weijie Xia, Stefanie Horian, Hanyue Huang, Queena K. Qian, Jie Yang, Pedro P. Vergara Barrios
arXiv:2411. 10109v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning can predict human behavior well when substantial structured data are available for well-defined outcomes.
By Joon Sung Park, Carolyn Q. Zou, Jonne Kamphorst, Niles Egan, Aaron Shaw, Benjamin Mako Hill, Carrie Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, Robb Willer, Michael S. Bernstein
arXiv:2606. 18258v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) exhibit a wide range of human-like behaviors, from expressing thoughts and emotions, to engaging in relationship-building with users, to refusing requests and maintaining boundaries.
By Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Margit Bowler, Leon A Gatys
arXiv:2606. 06360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modelling individual decision-making during infectious disease outbreaks is crucial for understanding behavioural dynamics and informing effective public health interventions.
By Yonchanok Khaokaew, Ruochen Kong, Andreas Zufle, Hao Xue, Taylor Anderson, Chandini Raina MacIntyre, Matthew Scotch, Flora D. Salim, David J Heslop
arXiv:2606. 16723v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly take actions (screening applicants, recommending credit, triaging patients), yet fairness for LLMs is still measured by grading answers.
By Triveni Morla, Rohith Reddy Bellibaltu, Manpreet Singh, Manmeet Singh Kapoor