arXiv Machine Learning

PICID: Proof-Driven Clause Learning in Neural Network Verification

arXiv AI
Aug 28

ProofEvolve: Neuro-Symbolic Evolution for Formal Automated Theorem Proving

ProofEvolve is a neuro‑symbolic framework that evolves formally verified symbolic proof structures alongside neural models to expand the knowledge boundary in automated theorem proving. The neural component proposes variation operators such as decompositions, repairs, and schema recombinations, while the Lean kernel verifies every proof transition, ensuring formal soundness. Across three competition‑level Lean benchmarks, ProofEvolve achieves the highest average solve rate among evaluated proof systems.

By Wenqian Ye, Ziwei Guan, Eric Xie, Bohan Liu, Shivani Modi, Buyun Zhang, Ellie Dingqiao Wen, Henry Kautz, Aidong Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 4

veriFIRE: an Industrial Case Study in Verifying Consistency Properties for a DNN-Based Wildfire Detection System

arXiv:2606. 04121v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present our ongoing work on the veriFIRE project: a collaboration between industry and academia, aimed at applying verification to increase the reliability of a real-world, safety-critical system.

By Idan Refaeli, Maya Swisa, Itay Buchnik, Alon Zada, Guy Amir, Elad Mandelbaum, Ziv Freund, Guy Katz
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Certified but Private: Scalable Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Neural Network Guarantees

PANDA is a scalable system that uses zero‑knowledge proofs to certify the robustness and fairness of neural networks without revealing their private parameters. Built on the CROWN robustness framework, PANDA introduces a novel algorithm for proving linear relaxation bounds on non‑linear activation layers, producing lightweight proofs. The system can generate proofs for networks with over 2.9 million parameters in just five minutes and verify them in ten seconds, scaling polynomially with network size and enabling verification of models four orders of magnitude larger than prior ZKP‑based approaches.

By Youwei Zhong, Ben Merbaum, Timos Antonopoulos, Ning Luo, Charalampos Papamanthou, Katerina Sotiraki, Ruzica Piskac
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 14

Branch and Bound for Relational Verification of Neural Networks

arXiv:2608. 13118v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Verification of neural networks against relational specifications, such as global robustness, is crucial for safety-critical applications of cyber-physical systems (CPS), given their increasing adoption of AI components.

By Kota Fukuda, Zhenya Zhang, Guanqin Zhang, Jianjun Zhao
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Mask-Proof: An LLM-based Automated Data Curation Pipeline on Mathematical Proofs

arXiv:2606. 15258v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of mathematical problem solving and can even assist with research-level proofs, yet we still lack a scalable and reproducible way to measure step-level reasoning in long proofs across diverse sources.

By Jierui Zhang, Siyuan Tan, Xinhang Li, Longzhuangzhi Lin, Dailin Li, Chengfeng Gu, Xinping Li, Yaxian Hao, Shengjia Liang, Yuxiang Ren, Wenhao Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Neuron Activation-based Computation of Logical Explanations for Deep Neural Networks

The paper introduces a flexible symbolic framework that efficiently computes logical explanations for deep neural networks by parameterizing explanations with internal neuron activations and leveraging general-purpose logical engines like SMT solvers. Unlike previous methods that rely on specialized verifiers or are limited to individual input features, this approach is not restricted in shape and can scale to deep architectures. Experiments on image recognition and medical benchmarks demonstrate improved computational efficiency and the ability to explain networks that were previously intractable for logic-based methods.

By Tom\'a\v{s} Kol\'arik, Faezeh Labbaf, Fabrizio Leopardi, Grigory Fedyukovich, Michael Wand, Natasha Sharygina