arXiv Computer Vision

Closing the Navigation Compliance Gap in End-to-end Autonomous Driving

The paper introduces NaviHydra, a trajectory‑scoring planner that addresses a navigation compliance gap in end‑to‑end autonomous driving. It proposes a new binary Navigation Compliance metric (NAVI) and a Controllability Measure (CM), and releases the NavControl dataset with 14,918 intersection scenarios and over 34,000 direction samples. NaviHydra achieves high performance on NAVSIM and NavControl benchmarks, and training with NavControl improves controllability across various architectures.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 28

Closed-Loop Aware Planning via Imitation-Free Speed Scoring for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

The paper introduces Closed-Loop Aware Planning for Autonomous Driving (CLAP‑AD), a new planning head that learns a driving path via imitation while independently scoring candidate speeds using a learned function guided by safety constraints. Unlike traditional open‑loop imitation learning, CLAP‑AD allows explicit test‑time control over speed selection without requiring speed‑conditioned training. Experiments on Bench2Drive‑Speed, Bench2Drive, and NAVSIM v2 demonstrate significant improvements in speed‑adherence and overall driving performance compared to state‑of‑the‑art baselines.

By Emad Aghajanzadeh, Thomas Schwarzfischer, Marc Kaufeld, Moritz Thoma, Ryan P\'egoud, Manoj Rohit Vemparala, Pierpaolo Mori, Nael Fasfous, Johannes Betz, Daniel Mueller-Gritschneder, Ulf Schlichtmann
arXiv AI
Oct 2

UrbanVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Urban Micromobility

UrbanVLA is a Vision‑Language‑Action framework designed to enable delivery robots to navigate large‑scale urban environments using long‑horizon route instructions. The model aligns noisy route waypoints with visual observations and plans trajectories, trained through a two‑stage pipeline of supervised fine‑tuning on simulated data and reinforcement fine‑tuning on mixed simulation and real‑world data. Experiments show UrbanVLA outperforms strong baselines by over 55% on the SocialNav task and demonstrates reliable real‑world navigation in large urban settings.

By Anqi Li, Zhiyong Wang, Jiazhao Zhang, Minghan Li, Yunpeng Qi, Zhibo Chen, Zhizheng Zhang, He Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Guiding End-to-End Driving Models with Endpoint-Constrained Trajectory Optimization

The paper introduces Endpoint-Constrained Optimization (ECO), a lightweight postprocessing layer that corrects intermediate waypoints of end-to-end driving policies while preserving the predicted endpoint. ECO does not require maps, privileged simulator state, or additional training, and can be applied to a wide range of waypoint-emitting policies. Experiments on two closed-loop simulators show that ECO significantly improves closed-loop performance, achieving top results in the HUGSIM Closed-Loop Driving Challenge and boosting scene scores on AlpaSim.

By Brayden Zhang, Mahsa Golchoubian, Igor Gilitschenski, Boris Ivanovic, Kashyap Chitta
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 25

Learning to Navigate with Minimal Parameters: Decomposing Visual Navigation Through Closed-Form Geometric Interfaces

The paper introduces a compact visual navigation system that decomposes the task into three analytically‑computed geometric interfaces and three small learned modules: an egress predictor, a navigation predictor, and an endpoint‑pinned residual diffusion generator. Only 0.58 M of the 23 M parameters are trained on 44 k frames, achieving competitive success rates and the lowest collision rate among evaluated methods across 6 060 point‑goal episodes in 60 environments. The design allows further parameter reduction by replacing the frozen image encoder with a 0.54 M MobileNetV2, supports zero‑shot deployment on a Jetson Orin Nano UGV, and enables transparent failure analysis under sensor corruption.

By Edward Beng Wai Tan, Siew-Kei Lam
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

Expand-and-Prune: Test-Time Candidate-Space Adaptation for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Expand-and-Prune is a test‑time framework for candidate‑based end‑to‑end autonomous driving planners that dynamically expands and prunes the set of trajectory hypotheses. It adds new candidates guided by semantic driving intent and temporally propagated predictions, then uses uncertainty in intermediate trajectory scores to prune the expanded set. Across four planners and four benchmarks, the method consistently improves planning performance, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on LangAuto and significant gains on Bench2Drive, Fail2Drive, and NAVSIMv2, especially in out‑of‑distribution scenarios.

By Fabian Schmidt, Karol Fedurko, Markus Enzweiler, Abhinav Valada
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 17

CORAL: Curriculum-Optimized Reward Adaptation for LiDAR-Based Goal-Directed Urban Driving

arXiv:2608. 14332v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning is promising for autonomous urban driving, but long-horizon goal-directed navigation asks a policy to acquire several competing behaviors at once--reaching a distant goal, tracking a route, avoiding obstacles, obeying signals--and a fixed objective gives no order in which to learn them.

By Anisa Saleem, Duksu Kim
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 12

FPD-Drive: Future Policy Distillation for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

FPD-Drive is an end‑to‑end autonomous driving planner that uses future‑privileged multi‑target distillation to transfer diverse, high‑quality trajectory targets from a teacher model with access to future observations to a student policy. It also introduces safety‑aware score correction to improve candidate selection by adjusting rankings between safe and unsafe trajectories. The approach achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on NAVSIM v1 and v2 benchmarks and demonstrates strong zero‑shot closed‑loop results on HUGSIM.

By Li-Heng Chen, Qifeng Chen, Chengwei Wu, Yingjie Zhang, Sheng Yang, Hongbo Fu, Shaoqing Ren