SpanCalib-VLM is a hybrid system for detecting hallucinated text spans in Vision‑Language Models. It combines a multimodal sequence tagger (XLM‑RoBERTa‑Large + SigLIP) with a fine‑tuned generative VLM (Qwen3.5‑4B‑SHROOM‑SFT) and uses a Union‑Calibrated Fusion strategy to re‑score candidate spans. On the SHROOM‑Visions English evaluation split, the ensemble achieves a Pearson calibration correlation of 0.41, an overall IoU of 0.39, a clean‑response IoU of 0.91, and a detection accuracy of 70.7%.
By Amanuel Gizachew Abebe, Yasmin Moslem
In 2026, we held the fourth iteration of the SHROOM Shared Task series: SHROOM-Visions (\textbf{S}hared-task on \textbf{H}allucinations and \textbf{R}elated \textbf{O}bservable \textbf{O}vergeneration...
In 2026, the SHROOM-Visions shared task was launched at the UncertaiNLP Workshop co‑located with EMNLP to address hallucinations in large vision‑language models. The task builds on the SHEEP dataset and asks participants to detect and classify fine‑grained hallucination spans in image‑conditioned text generation across four languages (Chinese, English, French, Italian) using a five‑class taxonomy. The competition attracted 27 teams and over 600 system submissions, with top systems achieving character‑level, label‑conditioned, and IoU scores of 0.58, 0.46, and 0.51 respectively, surpassing baselines by 30‑40 points.
By Ra\'ul V\'azquez, Aman Sinha, Chuyuan Li, Claudio Savelli, Eduardo Cal\`o, Emilio Raimond, Stella Frank, Hengyu Luo, Flavio Giobergia, Vincent Segonne, Lorenzo Vaiani, J\"org Tiedemann, Timothee Mickus
arXiv:2609.24198v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: This paper describes the SKstars submission to SHROOM-Visions 2026, a shared task on fine-grained hallucination detection in large vision-language mo...
By Ali Athar, Imran Ahsan, Joon-Yong Jung
The article surveys hallucination issues in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs), a type of multimodal foundation model that blends visual data with large language models. It categorizes hallucination causes into model architecture and data quality, presents a taxonomy of mitigation strategies, and critically evaluates existing evaluation benchmarks from both discriminative and generative viewpoints. The survey also outlines open challenges and future research directions to improve LVLM reliability and trustworthiness.
By Yinghao Guo, Wei Lan, Wenyi Chen, Qingfeng Chen, Shichao Zhang, Shirui Pan, Huiyu Zhou, Yi Pan
ReWEIGH the Evidence is a training‑free decoding technique that calibrates token‑level ordinal visual evidence to reduce hallucinations in large vision‑language models. It aggregates vocabulary ranks across visual positions, compares candidates to a token‑specific reference derived from unlabeled images, and applies a bounded penalty only when evidence falls below this reference. Experiments on four 7B backbones show up to a 21.3% reduction in hallucinated object mentions while largely preserving or improving descriptive and general performance, with minimal added latency.
By Jihae Jeong, Junha Choi, Hwanjo Yu
The paper introduces Dynamic Alignment Compensation (DAC), a training‑free inference‑time technique designed to reduce hallucinations in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs). DAC monitors cross‑modal representation drift across decoder layers and generation steps, applying lightweight residual compensation through Layer‑wise Semantic Compensation and Sequential Semantic Correction. Experiments on nine multimodal benchmarks across various LVLM backbones demonstrate that DAC consistently lowers hallucination rates while preserving overall performance.
By Kairong Yu, Zixin Zhu, Le Yu, Hongwei Wang
The paper introduces the concept of multi-view hallucination (MVH), where large vision-language models produce incorrect answers when processing images from multiple viewpoints. It presents MVH-Bench, a benchmark of 4.8k question-answer pairs that target cross-instance and cross-view hallucinations, and shows that MVH is common across recent models. The authors propose Reference Shift Contrastive Decoding (RSCD), a training-free decoding method that mitigates visual interference, achieving significant performance gains on MVH-Bench with LLaVA-OneVision and Qwen2.5-VL.
By Wooje Park, Insu Lee, Soohyun Kim, Jaeyun Jang, Minyoung Noh, Kyuhong Shim, Byonghyo Shim
arXiv:2608. 10835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) achieve impressive visual reasoning and dialogue capabilities, yet frequently hallucinate content unsupported by the visual input.
By Dvir Samuel, Guy Bar-Shalom, Fabrizio Frasca, Ethan Fetaya, Yftah Ziser, Gal Chechik, Haggai Maron
The paper reports a submission to the SHROOM-Visions shared task, aiming to detect and classify hallucinated character spans in vision‑language model outputs across four languages. The authors use multiple fine‑tuned vision‑language models as independent annotators, combine their predictions via character‑level majority voting, and also investigate activation probes. Their method achieved first place in three of the four languages and consistently ranked on the podium for all languages and metrics, with analysis showing that model disagreement mirrors human annotator disagreement.
By Toqeer Ehsan, Nico Penttil\"a, Richard Schmidt, Arash Hajikhani, Victoria Palacin
The paper introduces CADMP, a lightweight framework for detecting object hallucinations in large vision‑language models. CADMP measures cross‑modal attention drift between adjacent layers and verifies predictions by masking visually relevant regions, combining these signals to identify hallucinated outputs. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that CADMP achieves competitive detection performance, and ablation studies confirm the complementary roles of attention drift and mask‑based verification.
By Xuanbing Wen, Boxu Chen, Le Yang, Jiakai Wang, Zhengyu Zhao, Chenhao Lin, Chao Shen
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) integrate visual perception with language generation, enabling responses that span image understanding and complex reasoning. However, LVLMs do not just inherit the text-level hallucinations; they also hallucinate against the image, producing fluent responses ungrounded in what they see.