In 2026, we held the fourth iteration of the SHROOM Shared Task series: SHROOM-Visions (\textbf{S}hared-task on \textbf{H}allucinations and \textbf{R}elated \textbf{O}bservable \textbf{O}vergeneration...
arXiv:2609.24198v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: This paper describes the SKstars submission to SHROOM-Visions 2026, a shared task on fine-grained hallucination detection in large vision-language mo...
By Ali Athar, Imran Ahsan, Joon-Yong Jung
SpanCalib-VLM is a hybrid system for detecting hallucinated text spans in Vision‑Language Models. It combines a multimodal sequence tagger (XLM‑RoBERTa‑Large + SigLIP) with a fine‑tuned generative VLM (Qwen3.5‑4B‑SHROOM‑SFT) and uses a Union‑Calibrated Fusion strategy to re‑score candidate spans. On the SHROOM‑Visions English evaluation split, the ensemble achieves a Pearson calibration correlation of 0.41, an overall IoU of 0.39, a clean‑response IoU of 0.91, and a detection accuracy of 70.7%.
By Amanuel Gizachew Abebe, Yasmin Moslem
arXiv:2607. 07507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucinations in vision language models (VLMs) are commonly treated as semantic errors, yet they often arise from partial or ambiguous visual evidence.
By Feng He, Zhenting Wang, Qifan Wang, Qiang Guan, Dongfang Liu, Ruixiang Tang, Qiankun Li
ReWEIGH the Evidence is a training‑free decoding technique that calibrates token‑level ordinal visual evidence to reduce hallucinations in large vision‑language models. It aggregates vocabulary ranks across visual positions, compares candidates to a token‑specific reference derived from unlabeled images, and applies a bounded penalty only when evidence falls below this reference. Experiments on four 7B backbones show up to a 21.3% reduction in hallucinated object mentions while largely preserving or improving descriptive and general performance, with minimal added latency.
By Jihae Jeong, Junha Choi, Hwanjo Yu
The article surveys hallucination issues in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs), a type of multimodal foundation model that blends visual data with large language models. It categorizes hallucination causes into model architecture and data quality, presents a taxonomy of mitigation strategies, and critically evaluates existing evaluation benchmarks from both discriminative and generative viewpoints. The survey also outlines open challenges and future research directions to improve LVLM reliability and trustworthiness.
By Yinghao Guo, Wei Lan, Wenyi Chen, Qingfeng Chen, Shichao Zhang, Shirui Pan, Huiyu Zhou, Yi Pan