Hugging Face Trending Papers

Out-of-Distribution Detection in Continual Learning

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Realistic Continual Learning Approach using Pre-trained Models

arXiv:2404.07729v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Continual learning (CL) evaluates adaptability in learning solutions to retain knowledge. Our research addresses the challenge of catastrophic forg...

By Nadia Nasri, Carlos Guti\'errez-\'Alvarez, Sergio Lafuente-Arroyo, Saturnino Maldonado-Basc\'on, Roberto J. L\'opez-Sastre
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 23

Fine-Grained Analysis of Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learning via Algorithmic Stability

The paper introduces an algorithmic stability framework to analyze catastrophic forgetting in continual learning using SGD, without assuming a specific model architecture. It decomposes forgetting into intra‑task and cross‑task generalization gaps plus empirical forgetting, and derives bounds for different learning‑rate schedules. Experiments on Split CIFAR‑100 and Split MiniImageNet illustrate the theoretical insights.

By Guodong Zheng, Yan Sun, Peng Wang, Enneng Yang, Jiafei Lyu, Xiaochun Cao, Dacheng Tao, Li Shen
arXiv AI
Oct 16

CRAFT: Forgetting-Aware Intervention-Based Adaptation for Continual Learning

CRAFT is a continual learning framework that freezes model weights and learns low‑rank interventions on hidden representations to mitigate catastrophic forgetting. Tasks that are similar share an intervention, determined by how they change the model’s output distribution, and a KL penalty keeps new tasks close to existing behavior. The approach also allows task identification at test time without explicit labels and shows improved performance and reduced forgetting across benchmarks compared to LoRA‑based methods.

By Md Anwar Hossen, Fatema Siddika, Juan Pablo Munoz, Tanya Roosta, Ali Jannesari
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Forgetting, plasticity, and co-observation: a third facet of continual learning

The paper argues that catastrophic forgetting and loss of plasticity alone cannot explain why naive sequential training underperforms offline joint training. It introduces data co-observation as a third factor, showing that observing training data together consistently improves performance across supervised and self-supervised settings. The study also reinterprets common continual learning methods, suggesting that memory replay’s success stems from restoring co-observation benefits rather than merely mitigating forgetting.

By Timm Hess, Abhishek Jha, Gido M. van de Ven, Tinne Tuytelaars