arXiv:2605.13841v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Voice agents are increasingly deployed across enterprise applications. However, no existing benchmark jointly addresses realistic conversatio...
By Tara Bogavelli, Gabrielle Gauthier Melan\c{c}on, Katrina Stankiewicz, Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Fanny Riols, Hoang H. Nguyen, Raghav Mehndiratta, Lindsay Devon Brin, Joseph Marinier, Hari Subramani, Anil Madamala, Sridhar Krishna Nemala, Srinivas Sunkara
arXiv:2609.24812v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Voice provides a natural and immediate interface for AI agents. Many settings in which voice agents could be useful, including meetings, households, an...
By Chenxu Xiong, Dongming Shen, Yuzhi Tang, Wentao Ma, Mu Li, Alex Smola
arXiv:2606. 29472v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: SWE-agent established the action interface as an underexplored design axis for software-engineering agents; we make the analogous case for the observation interface in computer-use (CU) agents.
By Bojie Li, Noah Shi
The paper introduces KVoiceBench, KOpenAudioBench, and KMMAU—three Korean speech benchmarks created through agent-driven frameworks that adapt existing SpokenQA and ASR resources into Korean SpokenQA and audio understanding tasks. These benchmarks total 12,345 samples and are publicly released to evaluate SpeechLMs beyond English. The authors benchmark eight recent SpeechLMs, revealing significant English‑Korean performance gaps and divergent rankings between SpokenQA and audio understanding, highlighting multilingual weaknesses not apparent in English-only tests.
By Haechan Kim, Seungjun Chung, Inkyu Park, Jihoo Lee, Jonghyun Lee
arXiv:2609.38867v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) computer-use agents are typically evaluated with clean written instructions, despite speech being an increasingly popular in...
By Terumi Chiba, Guangzhi Sun, Zheqi Yuan, Chao Zhang
arXiv:2606. 06559v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Full-duplex spoken dialogue models allow voice agents to listen and speak concurrently, enabling natural interaction with real-time overlap.
By Tao Zhong, Jiajun Deng, Nikita Kuzmin, Yinke Zhu, Tianxiang Cao, Tristan Tsoi, Zhili Tan, Simon Lui, Xunying Liu
The paper reviews the fragmented literature on real‑time voice agents, noting that architecture, turn‑taking, and agentic evaluation communities rarely cite each other. It presents three evidence‑based claims: (1) architecture choice is a deployment constraint rather than a definitive solution, (2) evaluation has shifted from component quality to grounded outcomes, and (3) the dyadic assumption is breaking down as multiparty turn‑taking and reasoning become essential. The authors propose the TRG reporting standard to characterize agents by timing, recovery, and state‑verified outcomes, with an optional fourth axis for multiparty contexts.
By Shivam Negi, Arpit Rawat, Rashi Jain
The paper introduces llmovoice, a middleware that explicitly models voice context for large language model (LLM) serving in voice AI applications. By incorporating speaking rate, background noise, packet loss, and other paralinguistic factors into a bounded context, llmovoice guides the LLM to generate more aligned responses. Experiments show significant reductions in speaking‑rate errors, false interruptions, and model usage costs, especially in long voice sessions.
By Linyi Jiang, Silvery D. Fu, Yifei Zhu
arXiv:2603. 02794v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present TVF (Time-Varying Filtering), an interpretable, low-latency speech enhancement model for real-time, on-device assistive hearing.
By Riccardo Rota, Kiril Ratmanski, Jozef Coldenhoff, Milos Cernak
The paper introduces Inquesto Score (IS), a protocol that measures voice‑agent reliability by calculating the percentage of calls that reach the caller’s goal without functional failure. IS defines explicit failure events and severity levels, evaluates timing, semantic, and state‑dependent failures using audio, scenario predicates, tool traces, and a pinned open‑model judge, and provides diagnostic views on behavior, acoustic robustness, identity handling, and speaker groups. The authors evaluate IS v0.1 on 30 scenarios, three acoustic conditions, four speaker groups, and 306 calls per agent across 13 configurations, demonstrating that reliable measurement requires evidence beyond transcripts and explicit treatment of deployment conditions.
By Massa Baali, Bhiksha Raj
arXiv:2608. 19936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Public benchmarks are important measures of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) model capabilities.
By Theo Lebryk, David Ayllon, Alice Baird, Jakub Piotr C{\l}apa, Jens Madsen, Panagiotis Tzirakis
arXiv:2608. 07631v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based full-duplex voice services allow users to speak while the assistant is responding.
By Shibo Wang, Zicheng Zhang, Libo Wang, Junfeng Ma