arXiv:2608.24743v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Existing linear program (LP) and semidefinite program (SDP) relaxations for rectified linear unit (ReLU) neural network (NN) verification yield overly-...
By Hanna Jiamei Zhang, Alan Papalia, Michael Everett, David M. Rosen
arXiv:2606. 30935v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While neural network control policies are powerful, their deployment on safety critical systems depends on ensuring that they obey strict constraints.
By Long Kiu Chung, Shreyas Kousik
arXiv:2605. 30155v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The increasing integration of deep neural networks in critical systems has spawned a theoretical and practical interest in formally guaranteeing safety properties about their behavior.
By Ido Shmuel, Guy Katz
arXiv:2606. 23858v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A primary challenge in AI safety is the existence of adversarial examples -- slightly distorted inputs that cause a neural network (NN) to misclassify.
By Merkouris Papamichail, Konstantinos Varsos, Giorgos Flouris, Jo\~ao Marques-Silva
arXiv:2609.34628v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Neural network verification (NNV) formally verifies that a network satisfies a specified property for all inputs within a defined region. Mod...
By Hai Duong, Thanh Le, ThanhVu Nguyen
The paper introduces a method for constructing L-Lipschitz deep residual networks (ResNets) using a Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) framework. By reformulating the ResNet architecture as a pseudo-tridiagonal LMI and applying the Gershgorin circle theorem, the authors derive closed‑form constraints on network parameters that guarantee Lipschitz continuity. The work also presents a compositional framework for handling recursive systems in hierarchical architectures, while noting that the Gershgorin-based approximations can over‑constrain the system, reducing expressive capacity.
By Marius F. R. Juston, William R. Norris, Dustin Nottage, Ahmet Soylemezoglu
arXiv:2610. 11313v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A fundamental question in neural network architecture optimization is whether the minimum hidden-neuron count required to approximate a target function within a prescribed tolerance can be computed efficiently.
By Sangrock Lee
PANDA is a scalable system that uses zero‑knowledge proofs to certify the robustness and fairness of neural networks without revealing their private parameters. Built on the CROWN robustness framework, PANDA introduces a novel algorithm for proving linear relaxation bounds on non‑linear activation layers, producing lightweight proofs. The system can generate proofs for networks with over 2.9 million parameters in just five minutes and verify them in ten seconds, scaling polynomially with network size and enabling verification of models four orders of magnitude larger than prior ZKP‑based approaches.
By Youwei Zhong, Ben Merbaum, Timos Antonopoulos, Ning Luo, Charalampos Papamanthou, Katerina Sotiraki, Ruzica Piskac
arXiv:2602.17493v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: We develop a method for training neural networks on Boolean data in which the values at all nodes are strictly $\pm 1$, and the resulting mod...
By Veit Elser, Manish Krishan Lal
arXiv:2608. 12655v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A flat training curve does not reveal whether a neural network has reached a global optimum, is locally trapped, is representation-limited, or is mismatched to its trainer.
By Farhang Yeganegi, Arian Eamaz, Mojtaba Soltanalian
arXiv:2602. 06737v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present a generalized framework for the range verification of neural networks featuring non-linear activation functions.
By Noah Schwartz, Chandra Kanth Nagesh, Sriram Sankaranarayanan, Ramneet Kaur, Tuhin Sahai, Susmit Jha
arXiv:2608. 09707v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Embedding trained neural networks as surrogates within optimisation problems is an established practice in operations research.
By Yu Liu, Jan Kronqvist, Fabricio Oliveira