The article reviews how transformer models, retrieval‑grounded pipelines, and large language models are reshaping hadith computational science. It critically evaluates existing literature, highlighting uneven progress: expanded data resources and mature segmentation tasks, yet persistent issues such as narrow corpora, weak benchmark comparability, and limited reproducibility. The authors argue that hadith computation should be viewed as an evidence‑infrastructure problem requiring knowledge integration, provenance, and expert supervision, and they propose a research agenda to strengthen the field’s methodological rigor.
By Md. Ashraful Haque (Greentech Apps Foundation, United Kingdom), Riasat Islam (Greentech Apps Foundation, United Kingdom, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom)
Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent Arabic answers, yet factual errors remain difficult to detect, localize, explain, and verify. Existing hallucination benchmarks often provide response-level labels, with limited support for identifying the exact erroneous content, explaining why it is incorrect, or selecting the correct factual answer.
arXiv:2607. 24117v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern multi-agent knowledge systems increasingly accumulate knowledge through chains of autonomous transformations rather than direct retrieval.
By Ali Zahid Raja
arXiv:2608. 07508v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are already advisors to millions of people of faith who bring them real decisions.
By M. Waleed Kadous (iaser.ai, Faith Family Technology Network), Benjamin Olsen (Faith Family Technology Network)
arXiv:2509. 00761v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed for legal question answering, where evaluations typically focus on multiple-choice accuracy.
By Boqin Yuan, Ziqi Wang
An LLM-based agent is a loop that reads itself. Agentic frameworks externalize identity, memory, and disposition into editable files.
arXiv:2607. 11276v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ensuring the quality of educational materials requires more than standard proofreading: textbooks must be audited for factual accuracy, domain-specific technical correctness, and linguistic quality simultaneously -- a task that general-purpose grammar checkers cannot address.
By Ciprian Cristescu, Adrian-Marius Dumitran, Angela-Liliana Dumitran, Gabriel Stefan
arXiv:2607. 18064v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents can now be left alone to improve software against a score.
By Nursultan Askarbekuly, Mohamad Al Mdfaa, Ahmed Helaly, Gonzalo Ferrer, Manuel Mazzara
arXiv:2607. 03233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid growth of publicly available digital information has rendered manual open-source intelligence (OSINT) analysis insufficient for modern intelligence, cybersecurity, and cyber investigation.
By Eduardo Almeida Palmieri, Mohamed Chahine Ghanem, Dipo Dunsin, Zubair Baig, Ed de Quincey, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo
MITRE‑SAGE is a multi‑agent retrieval‑augmented generation framework that combines semantic and structural cybersecurity knowledge to enhance large language model question‑answering. It decomposes tasks into query interpretation, evidence retrieval, and answer synthesis, supporting vulnerability assessment, threat profiling, and relationship extraction. The authors also introduce MITRE‑QA, a benchmark of 3,000 question‑answer pairs, and show that MITRE‑SAGE outperforms standalone LLMs and conventional RAG methods, with a lightweight configuration achieving top performance on most tasks.
By Ali Habibzadeh, Farid Feyzi, Reza Ebrahimi Atani
MITRE‑SAGE is a multi‑agent retrieval‑augmented generation framework that combines semantic and structural cybersecurity knowledge to enhance large language model question‑answering. It decomposes tasks into query interpretation, evidence retrieval, and answer synthesis, supporting vulnerability assessment, threat profiling, and relationship extraction. Experiments show that MITRE‑SAGE outperforms standalone LLMs and conventional RAG methods, with a lightweight Qwen2.5‑based configuration excelling on most benchmark tasks.
By Ali Habibzadeh, Farid Feyzi, Reza Ebrahimi Atani
The paper surveys the state of Explainable AI (XAI) in Arabic NLP, highlighting three gaps: a method gap where Arabic XAI relies mainly on limited post‑hoc techniques; a task gap with most work focused on classification tasks and little on generation, retrieval, or dialogue; and a linguistic gap where explanations rarely address Arabic‑specific phenomena such as morphology, dialects, and diglossia. It proposes a taxonomy of tasks, methods, linguistic units, and evaluation practices, and outlines a research agenda for linguistically grounded Arabic XAI.
By Salima Lamsiyah, Ruslan Mitkov