arXiv AI

Preventing Data Hallucinations in Agentic AI for Optical Network Troubleshooting

An agentic AI system for automated troubleshooting in optical communication networks is demonstrated that integrates data references into the agent architecture to prevent data hallucinations. This integration improves the interpretability and trustworthiness of root‑cause identification and reasoning. The approach addresses a key challenge in deploying AI for network maintenance by reducing erroneous outputs.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

Emergence of Agentic AI: A Review on Evolution, Background, Working Principles, Applications, Adoption Factors, and Future Research Directions

The article reviews the emergence of Agentic AI, covering its evolution, theoretical foundations, working principles, and architectural aspects. It surveys recent scholarly contributions across various domains, highlighting real‑world applications, current research findings, and existing challenges. The review also proposes a framework for stakeholder adoption and outlines future research directions to guide researchers and practitioners.

By AKM Bahalul Haque, Al Amin Islam Ridoy, Mohammad Rayhan, Ivan Porres
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 20

Human Grounded Evaluation of Large Language Models for Optical Network Automation

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for network automation, yet their output quality and inference cost can vary substantially across LLM families. We present HuGLEN, a stepwise evaluation pipeline that uses an LLM-as-a-judge together with a small set of expert ratings to enable scalable and reproducible comparison of candidate LLMs, and to rank them using a quality efficiency score (QES).

arXiv AI
Sep 11

Can AI Agents Detect and Repair Artifact Drift in Network Experiments?

The paper introduces NetArtifactBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether AI agents can detect and repair inconsistencies in network experiment records while preserving supported claims. It tests 23 agent configurations on 52 instances with injected inconsistencies, finding an average pass rate of 65.3 % but no runtime exceeding 30 % for complex repairs that require recovering implicit relations and propagating changes across artifacts. The results highlight a clear distinction between local corrections and full record-level repair, leading the authors to argue that artifact integrity should be a primary design and evaluation criterion for AI agents in network systems.

By Tianzhu Zhang, Weichen Tao, Changgang Zheng, Yusheng Zheng, Long Chen, Xiaoyi Fan, Meikang Qiu
arXiv AI
2d ago

Signals: Continuous Diagnostics of AI Agents

The paper "Signals: Continuous Diagnostics of AI Agents" introduces a method for diagnosing problems in AI agents by analyzing agentic traces. It defines 45 problem types across eight families, categorizes findings into engineering issues called Signals, and assesses their severity. The method was evaluated on public agent executions, achieving a 91.43% F1 score in matching Signals to reference issues, outperforming a one-pass LLM control by about 18 percentage points.

By Amey Rambatla, Vatsal Goel, Sagar Gaur, Siddhant Loya, Anurag Mishra, Asif Mohammad
arXiv AI
Jun 4

Cascading Hallucination in Agentic RAG: The CHARM Framework for Detection and Mitigation

arXiv:2606. 04435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-step agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines have demonstrated significant capability for complex reasoning tasks, yet remain vulnerable to a class of failure that existing hallucination detection mechanisms systematically miss: cascading hallucination, where errors introduced at early pipeline stages propagate and amplify across successive reasoning steps, producing confident but factually incorrect final outputs.

By Saroj Mishra
arXiv AI
Jul 9

Security and Privacy in Agentic AI: Grand Challenges and Future Directions

arXiv:2607. 06608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present key challenges and future research directions in the security and privacy of agentic AI, based on a horizon-scanning exercise that brought together thirty leading international experts from academia, industry, and government to engage in focused discussions and collaborative exercises on the emerging risks associated with the growing agency of AI.

By Adam Jenkins, Agnieszka Kitkowska, Caterina Maidhof, Diego Paracuellos, Francesco Sovrano, Gonzalo Gabriel Mendez, Guillermo Suarez-Tangil, Hana Kopecka, Isabel Wagner, Isabel Barbera, Javier Carnerero-Cano, Jide Edu, Jose Luis Martin-Navarro, Jose Such, Josep Domingo-Ferrer, Juan Carlos Carrillo, Kopo Marvin Ramokapane, Mark Cote, Pablo Vellosillo, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz, Rongjun Ma, Ruba Abu-Salma, Sameer Patil, William Seymour, Xiao Zhan