Hugging Face Trending Papers

Human Grounded Evaluation of Large Language Models for Optical Network Automation

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for network automation, yet their output quality and inference cost can vary substantially across LLM families. We present HuGLEN, a stepwise evaluation pipeline that uses an LLM-as-a-judge together with a small set of expert ratings to enable scalable and reproducible comparison of candidate LLMs, and to rank them using a quality efficiency score (QES).

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 9

Generative Explainability for Next-Generation Networks: LLM-Augmented XAI with Mutual Feature Interactions

As artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) models become integral to network operations, their lack of transparency poses a significant barrier to operator trust. Existing explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques often fail to bridge this gap for non-specialists, producing technical outputs that are difficult to translate into actionable insights.

arXiv AI
Jul 9

From Agentic to Autogenic Network Management for AI-Native 6G and Beyond: A Standards Perspective

arXiv:2607. 06786v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standards bodies, including TM Forum, 3GPP, and ETSI, are converging on Agentic AI as the foundation for next-generation network management, where Large AI Model (LAM)-based agents autonomously interpret intent, coordinate resources, and adapt operational behaviors at runtime.

By Petar Djukic, Sudipta Acharya, Takai Eddine Kennouche, Burak Kantarci
arXiv AI
Aug 13

CTBench: Evaluating Troubleshooting Capabilities of AI Agents in Realistic Telecom Network Operations

arXiv:2608. 12002v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents are increasingly considered for automating network operations and maintenance, where engineers must diagnose network faults, optimize configurations to enhance services, and reduce operational costs while acting under strict constraints.

By Xingyu Yan, Tingting Dai, Antonio De Domenico, Mohamed Sana, Nicola Piovesan, Changchang Li, Bowen Liu, Kun Jiang, Mengjie Zhang, Dingcheng Shan, Jing-Cheng Pang, Chenwei Wu, Sijie Wu, Lianying Chao, Haoran Cai, Jiantao Ye, Xubin Li, Simon Mark Lucas, Xin Chen
arXiv AI
4d ago

Agentic AI for Scalable and Robust Optical Systems Control

arXiv:2602.20144v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present AgentOptics, an agentic AI framework for high-fidelity, autonomous optical system control built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP...

By Zehao Wang, Mingzhe Han, Wei Cheng, Yue-Kai Huang, Philip Ji, Denton Wu, Mahdi Safari, Flemming Holtorf, Kenaish AlQubaisi, Norbert M. Linke, Danyang Zhuo, Yiran Chen, Ting Wang, Dirk Englund, Tingjun Chen
arXiv AI
6d ago

Can You Check That? The Checkability Boundary for Local LLM Network Automation

The paper "Can You Check That? The Checkability Boundary for Local LLM Network Automation" proposes a method called Touchstone that uses local small language models (SLMs) to generate network‑automation candidates and applies task‑specific intrinsic checks to reject incorrect outputs before escalating to a larger frontier LLM. By defining a task as checkable when a cheap, deterministic test can reject outputs violating a necessary correctness condition, the authors demonstrate that Touchstone achieves high end‑to‑end accuracy (98.6% on conflict detection and 93.8% on intent translation) while escalating only a small fraction of inputs. The study shows that local inference is preferable when precise, low‑cost checks are available, whereas tasks lacking such checks should rely on the frontier model.

By Maleeha Masood, Momina Nofal