arXiv AI

Cost-Optimal Foundation Model Deployment Portfolio for Transportation Management

arXiv:2607. 13239v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models, including large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs), are increasingly used for transportation management center (TMC) tasks such as anomaly detection, incident reporting, and traveler information.

arXiv AI
Oct 2

OR for AI That Does OR: Routing LLMs up the Escalator inside the OSCAR Framework

The paper introduces OSCAR, an LLM‑based framework that translates business descriptions into accurate optimization models while verifying and improving them through a simulator, coder, and reviewer. OSCAR uses a cost‑ordered escalation strategy to select among LLMs of varying price and capability, achieving 95–100% accuracy on benchmark problems with local, open‑weight models. The framework also provides competitive guarantees and token‑cost advantages over existing LLMs like Codex and Claude Code.

By Jinzhi Bu, Haixin Tang, Huanan Zhang
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Drift-Aware LLM Routing with Sparse Contexts and Shared Budgets

The paper introduces Drift‑Aware Sparse Routing (DRS), a method for routing requests in a multi‑model language service while respecting compute, latency, memory, or cost budgets. DRS estimates reward and resource use from a rolling audit window, routes using pessimistic reward and optimistic cost estimates, updates resource shadow prices online, and applies a hard meter before commitment. The authors provide theoretical regret bounds that separate control from statistics, showing how the method adapts to non‑stationary prompt distributions and model changes.

By Cheung Hao Lee, Patrick Wong
arXiv AI
Jul 16

Inference Economics of Enterprise Coding Agents: A Case Study of Cloud vs. On-Premise LLMs

arXiv:2607. 13080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous coding agents force engineering organizations to choose between API-based frontier models -- strong reasoning at high token cost -- and on-premise quantized open-weights models, which promise low-marginal-cost scaling and data sovereignty at some loss of reasoning fidelity.

By Sheng-Wei Peng, Yi-Hsun Lin, Yi-Pei Lee
arXiv AI
Sep 30

You Cannot Pick a Provider From the Price List: Market-Aware Routing for Open-Weight LLM Inference

The paper demonstrates that in open‑weight LLM inference markets, selecting a model is insufficient; clients must also choose a provider, as the same model can differ markedly in quality, latency, availability, and price across providers. The authors propose a market‑aware routing approach, including a measured‑map policy and an online router called FACET, which certifies provider feasibility for each task and safely falls back to a reliable anchor. Experiments show that this strategy yields cost savings while maintaining quality and avoiding degraded endpoints.

By Liang He, Jingbo Wen, Yixiong Chen, Yue Yang, Qizhen Lan, Kangning Cui, Xilu Wang
arXiv AI
Jul 21

A Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Stochastic Demands and Outsourcing

arXiv:2607. 16875v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands and outsourcing options (VRP-SDO), in which a logistics service provider partitions customer requests into customers outsourced to a common carrier and customers committed to its fixed fleet.

By Mohsen Dastpak, Fausto Errico, Ola Jabali
arXiv AI
Jun 3

DTop-p MoE: Sparsity-Controlled Dynamic Top-p MoE for Foundation Model Pre-training

arXiv:2512. 13996v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts architectures are essential for scaling model capacity efficiently, yet the standard Top-$k$ routing imposes a rigid sparsity pattern that ignores the intrinsic variance in token difficulty and layer-specific computational needs.

By Can Jin, Hongwu Peng, Mingcan Xiang, Qixin Zhang, Xiangchi Yuan, Amit Hasan, Ohi Dibua, Yifan Gong, Yan Kang, Dimitris N. Metaxas