arXiv:2607. 08690v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates sampling from an autoregressive LLM by using a faster auxiliary model to draft tokens which are then verified in parallel by the LLM.
arXiv:2609.38510v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive LLMs by having a lightweight drafter propose tokens that the target model verifies in parallel. Diffusi...
Speculative decoding accelerates generation by verifying multiple drafted tokens in a single target-model forward pass, reducing sequential decoding iterations. Model-free variants avoid auxiliary draft models by reusing text and model states already available during generation, but their speedup depends on the reliability of the constructed drafts.
Speculative decoding accelerates sampling from an autoregressive LLM by using a faster auxiliary model to draft tokens which are then verified in parallel by the LLM. Standard speculative decoding is lossless: its rejection and resampling steps exactly preserve the LLM's sampling distribution.
arXiv:2609.14717v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference by verifying multiple drafted tokens in parallel, allowing a single target forward pass to accept seve...
arXiv:2608.29748v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive language model inference by having a lightweight draft model propose multiple candidate tokens, which a...
Draft-OPD introduces an on‑policy distillation method for speculative draft models, addressing the mismatch between supervised fine‑tuning and inference by letting the target model supervise the drafter on draft‑induced states. The approach uses target‑assisted rollouts for stable continuations and replays drafting from error positions exposed during verification, enabling the drafter to learn from both accepted and rejected proposals. Experiments demonstrate that Draft‑OPD achieves more than five‑fold lossless acceleration across diverse tasks, outperforming prior draft models such as EAGLE‑3 and DFlash by 23 % and 13 % respectively.
The paper introduces ADU, a fine‑grained training framework that unlearns sensitive information from large language models by decoupling contextual attention pathways instead of erasing tokens. ADU exploits the distinction between local and global attention heads to identify and suppress attention paths that retrieve persistent sensitive anchors, while preserving local‑attention structure and overall language modeling performance. Evaluation on the TOFU and WMDP benchmarks shows ADU achieves superior forget quality (0.93 on TOFU) and retains 92.9% of model utility compared to 81.9% for existing baselines, with fewer side effects in benign contexts.
The paper examines lossy verification techniques used in speculative decoding for large language models, showing that many methods can be grouped into truncation-based and collaborative verification categories. It analyzes how these approaches alter the decoding distribution, revealing that truncation-based methods can significantly degrade performance due to distributional distortion, while collaborative methods depend more on overshoot suppression and supervision quality than on simple interpolation between draft and target models. A diagnostic evaluation framework is introduced to assess these failure modes across curated benchmarks.
arXiv:2606. 04446v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive large language model inference by drafting multiple tokens and verifying them in a single target-model forward pass.
arXiv:2609.37029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive inference by verifying multiple draft tokens in a single target forward pass. However, as the context...
arXiv:2609.00082v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs acquire vast amounts of knowledge during pre-training, but often lack the specialized knowledge needed to answer questions from niche sources su...