arXiv AI

Carryover Drafting: Recycling Rejected States for Speculative Decoding

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

Training Parallel Speculative Draft Models by Directly Minimizing Expected Decoding Rounds

The paper introduces the Expected Decoding Rounds (EDR) objective, a theoretical framework that models speculative decoding as a Markov reward process and directly optimizes the number of decoding rounds. EDR weights local rejection costs by state occupancies, eliminating auxiliary hyperparameters and enabling unbiased stochastic optimization via temporal‑difference gradients. Applying EDR to fine‑tune state‑of‑the‑art draft models (DSpark and DFly) improves mean accepted length and outperforms prior training objectives across nine benchmarks in math reasoning, code generation, and chat.

By Yunxiao Zhao, Changxiao Cai
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 21

DStill: Trajectory Consistency Distillation for Accelerated One-Step Drafting in Block Diffusion Speculative Decoding

arXiv:2610.27379v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Block-diffusion speculative decoding accelerates large language model inference by drafting multiple tokens in parallel. However, one-step drafting i...

By Shreyas Kulkarni, Uttam Gurram, Madhav Kanda, Krishna Teja Chitty Venkata, Shichu Chen, Kartik Balasubramaniam, Supriyo Chakraborty, Sambit Sahu
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 1

DEdit: Iterative Draft Editing for Speculative Decoding

arXiv:2609.38510v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive LLMs by having a lightweight drafter propose tokens that the target model verifies in parallel. Diffusi...

By Longxuan Yu, Bingsen Chen, Peng Shi, Dongkyu Lee, Yi Xiang, Hideo Kobayashi, Sheng Zhang, Shuaichen Chang, Xing Niu, Zhuoyan Xu, Greg Ver Steeg, Jiarong Jiang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

Draft-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Speculative Draft Models

Draft-OPD introduces an on‑policy distillation method for speculative draft models, addressing the mismatch between supervised fine‑tuning and inference by letting the target model supervise the drafter on draft‑induced states. The approach uses target‑assisted rollouts for stable continuations and replays drafting from error positions exposed during verification, enabling the drafter to learn from both accepted and rejected proposals. Experiments demonstrate that Draft‑OPD achieves more than five‑fold lossless acceleration across diverse tasks, outperforming prior draft models such as EAGLE‑3 and DFlash by 23 % and 13 % respectively.

By Haodi Lei, Yafu Li, Haoran Zhang, Shunkai Zhang, Qianjia Cheng, Xiaoye Qu, Ganqu Cui, Bowen Zhou, Ning Ding, Yun Luo, Yu Cheng
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 7

DLoop: Looped Speculative Decoding

The paper introduces DLoop, a looped speculative decoding technique that adaptively performs multiple drafting stages before verification, allowing a draft model to continue generating tokens while confident. By verifying all accumulated draft tokens together and training the draft model to handle its own hidden states for unverified tokens, DLoop reduces the number of target‑model forward passes needed. Experiments across several speculative decoding methods show wall‑clock speedups of 5–41 % without sacrificing lossless decoding.

By Geonmo Gu, Byeongho Heo, HeeJae Jun, Yoohoon Kang, Sangmin Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

Contextual Correction of Parallel Draftsfor Speculative Decoding

The paper introduces DCOCO (DFlash Contextual Corrector), a lightweight mechanism that restores intra-block dependencies in speculative decoding by evaluating multiple candidate tokens for contextual compatibility across adjacent draft positions. DCOCO maintains parallel drafting while enabling contextually informed token selection at low additional cost. Across multiple verifier backbones and benchmarks, DCOCO achieves the highest average throughput, delivering speedups of up to 6.6× over vanilla decoding and outperforming competing methods by 6–23% under concurrent serving loads.

By Roy Eisenstadt, Harel Lidar, Tal Gonen, Omer Luxembourg, Itamar Zimerman, Lior Wolf, Eli David, Ilan Naiman
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

Long-Context Drafting Does Not Require Long-Context Drafters

The paper shows that long‑context drafting can be performed with short‑context drafters that are frozen and run beyond their training length, using two inference‑time mechanisms to keep their cost bounded. By bounding the attention cache and re‑basing rotary position indices, the authors demonstrate that the speedup achieved with a short‑context drafter persists up to two million tokens across multiple target‑drafter pairs and corpora. They prove that when a common index shift leaves the drafter’s computation unchanged, the acceptance gap can be tightly bounded, ensuring consistent performance.

By Aref Jafari, Vansh Bhatia, Matt Qin, Subhajit Dutta Chowdhury, Ben Lee, Vikram Appia, Ali Ghodsi, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 7

APEX: Speculate smarter, not deeper

The paper introduces APEX, a learned controller that improves speculative decoding for large language models by dynamically selecting the best speculation strategy and adjusting draft depth during generation. APEX uses request‑level routing among EAGLE‑3, n‑gram, and draft‑model speculation, and block‑level depth adaptation based on causal decoding signals and verifier feedback. Integrated into vLLM and tested with Qwen3‑8B, APEX achieves up to 5.24× speedup over autoregressive decoding while reducing wasted tokens by 41% compared to fixed‑depth n‑gram speculation.

By Manvi Jha, Zach Zhang, Zhichao Xu, Linbo Liu, Sai Muralidhar Jayanthi, Vinayak Arannil
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 10

Teaching Diffusion to Speculate Left-to-Right

Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, but their autoregressive decoding process incurs substantial inference costs due to inherently sequential token generation. Speculative decoding addresses this bottleneck by employing a lightweight draft model to propose multiple future tokens that are subsequently verified in parallel by a larger target model.