arXiv:2606. 06320v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model while preserving its general capabilities.
By Gizem Y\"uce, Giorgos Nikolaou, Nicolas Flammarion
The paper introduces Propose-Then-Project Unlearning (PTP-U), a method for large language model unlearning that first weakens target knowledge associations and then projects non-target outputs back to the original distribution to recover capabilities. PTP-U aims to satisfy forgetting constraints while preserving fluent generation and performance on non-target tasks. Experiments on three benchmarks show PTP-U achieves a strong forgetting‑retention trade‑off, with 81.22%–91.03% forgetting and an average of 94.20% non‑target utility.
By Xunlei Chen, Qinghui Gong, Jingkun Xue, Qihe Liu, Shijie Zhou, Fei Ye
arXiv:2610.09835v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Continual pre-training and fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) inevitably induce catastrophic forgetting, typically mitigated by replay using o...
By Jonghyun Han, Younghoon Song, Jongyoul Park
The paper introduces GAPE (Gated Adaptive Positional Encoding), a drop‑in augmentation for rotary positional encodings that adds content‑aware bias to attention logits while preserving rotary geometry. GAPE uses a query‑dependent gate to contract irrelevant context and a key‑dependent gate to keep salient distant tokens, leading to exponential attenuation of weakly protected context. Experiments show that GAPE improves long‑context robustness, extrapolating up to eight times the training length, and can be retrofitted into a pretrained 7B model without losing benchmark performance.
By Riccardo Ali, Alessio Borgi, Mario Severino, Pietro Li\`o, Christopher Irwin
arXiv:2609.16229v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove specific knowledge from a trained large language model (LLM) without retraining from scratch. Existing methods modify...
By Pingzhi Li, Jinhao Duan, Vaishnav Tadiparthi, Nakul Agarwal, Kwonjoon Lee, Ehsan Moradi Pari, Hossein Nourkhiz Mahjoub, Sijia Liu, Tianlong Chen
arXiv:2511. 20196v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can inadvertently memorize privacy-sensitive information during training.
By Zhen Zeng, Leijiang Gu, Zhangling Duan, Feng Li, Cees G. M. Snoek, Meng Wang, Zenglin Shi
arXiv:2605.15508v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The quadratic complexity of attention imposes severe memory and computational bottlenecks on Large Language Model (LLM) inference. This challenge i...
By Jiangnan Yu, Ceyu Xu, Yongji Wu, Yuan Xie
Nullify is a training‑free method for unlearning sensitive information from large language models by steering activations during inference. It uses steering vectors to redirect privacy‑related activations away from memorized answers while enforcing a null‑space constraint that preserves activations for retained queries, thereby maintaining model utility. Experiments on TOFU and MUSE demonstrate that Nullify matches or outperforms existing baselines in forget quality while keeping utility nearly intact, all without any weight updates.
By Wei Zhai, Xiang Liu, Qiang Huang, Rui Qian, Lemao Liu, Ziwei Li, Ziqi Wang, Zhitao Huang, Dejing Dou
The paper introduces a Fisher-guided submodular data selection method for continual pre‑training of large language models, addressing the forgetting problem that arises when a target‑domain corpus overwrites pretrained knowledge. By decomposing candidate gradients into anchor and frontier components and optimizing a log‑determinant submodular objective, the method selects data that both improves target‑domain performance and limits forgetting. Experiments on TinyLlama‑1.1B and Llama‑3.1‑8B show that the selector achieves superior adaptation and forgetting control while using ten times fewer tokens than traditional replay strategies.
By Zhenghao Zhao, Gaowen Liu, Zhiling Lan, Yan Yan
The paper identifies a problem in large language model (LLM) unlearning called forget‑set misalignment, where the set of data to be forgotten does not match what the model has actually memorized. Two failure modes are described: Under Unlearning, where memorized information is omitted from the forget set, and Out‑of‑Knowledge Unlearning, where the algorithm attempts to forget knowledge the model never learned, harming performance. The authors propose CONfs, a data‑blind framework that constructs model‑aligned forget sets by eliciting the model’s memorized knowledge, and demonstrate that it achieves near‑gold standard forgetting while preserving utility better than other data‑blind methods.
By Miso Kim, Georu Lee, Seungwon Jeong, Woojin Lee
arXiv:2610.01962v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The ability of vision-language models (VLMs) to associate visual identities with biographical information creates a need for selective unlearning of...
By Si Qi Goh, Cap Dang Xuan Kiet, Tat-Jen Cham, Kwok-Yan Lam
arXiv:2510.17021v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) unlearning is a key approach for removing undesired data, knowledge, or behaviors from pretrained models while ret...
By Bingqi Shang, Yiwei Chen, Yihua Zhang, Bingquan Shen, Sijia Liu