arXiv:2604. 17708v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Automating operations research (OR) with large language models (LLMs) remains limited by hand-crafted reasoning--execution workflows.
By Jiahao Huang, Peilan Xu, Xiaoya Nan, Wenjian Luo
arXiv:2606. 05608v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: For over half a century, software engineering has operated on a foundational premise: human engineers decompose problems, encode decision logic into static code, and manually adapt that code as requirements evolve.
By Zhenfeng Cao
arXiv:2606. 21228v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The capabilities of frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance, with different providers increasingly specializing in distinct domains.
By Yujin Tang, Edoardo Cetin, Jinglue Xu, Qi Sun, Stefan Nielsen, Vincent Richard, Haruto Goda, Iaroslav Tymchenko, Nhan Nguyen, Hyunin Lee, Mari Ashiga, Shashank Kotyan, So Kuroki, Tarin Clanuwat
arXiv:2609.05576v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The paradigm of LLMs has rapidly shifted from passive language interfaces to autonomous Claw-like agents that execute long-horizon tasks across statefu...
By Yirong Zeng, Shen You, Jinhang Feng, Yufei Liu, Xiao Ding, Yutai Hou, Hao Cong, Yuxian Wang, Wu Ning, Wang Xu, Bibo Cai
arXiv:2608.30478v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Cognitive language agents have achieved substantial progress by equipping language models with memory, tools, and decision-making procedures, enabling...
By Shihan Dou, Haoxiang Jia, Shichun Liu, Feng Chen, Chenhao Huang, Yujiong Shen, Shaofan Liu, Jiayi Chen, Jiahang Lin, Honglin Guo, Qianyu He, Minghao Guo, Ziyi Ye, Pluto Zhou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
arXiv:2607. 28629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid transition from reactive large language models (LLMs) to persistent, action-capable systems has exposed critical gaps in the architectural understanding of Agentic AI, particularly in separating inference, orchestration, and execution layers for autonomous AI agents.
By Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Ranjan Sapkota
arXiv:2601.12538v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making. While large language models (LLMs) d...
By Tianxin Wei, Ting-Wei Li, Zhining Liu, Xuying Ning, Ze Yang, Jiaru Zou, Zhichen Zeng, Ruizhong Qiu, Xiao Lin, Dongqi Fu, Zihao Li, Mengting Ai, Duo Zhou, Wenxuan Bao, Yunzhe Li, Gaotang Li, Cheng Qian, Yu Wang, Xiangru Tang, Yin Xiao, Liri Fang, Hui Liu, Xianfeng Tang, Yuji Zhang, Chi Wang, Jiaxuan You, Heng Ji, Hanghang Tong, Jingrui He
arXiv:2512. 22256v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Software issue resolution aims to address real-world issues in software repositories based on natural language descriptions provided by users, and represents a key aspect of software maintenance.
By Zhonghao Jiang, David Lo, Zhongxin Liu
arXiv:2608. 15591v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents deployed in production environments face a fundamental tension: the agent's behavior is frozen at deployment time, while the business rules and edge cases it must handle continue to evolve.
By Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran, Michael Zimmermann, Duncan Cambridge, Ashmita Kapoor, Tanya Dixit
Cognitive language agents have achieved substantial progress by equipping language models with memory, tools, and decision-making procedures, enabling agents to reason and act in interactive environme...
arXiv:2606. 05608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For over half a century, software engineering has operated on a foundational premise: human engineers decompose problems, encode decision logic into static code, and manually adapt that code as requirements evolve.
By Zhenfeng Cao
The paper introduces "environment evolution," a method that incrementally raises the difficulty of interactive environments off‑policy, scheduling their generation across training generations to supply continuous learning signals. It derives three evolution directions tied to a multi‑turn learning objective and implements them via a loop‑engineered multi‑agent harness. Experiments with models such as Hy4 preview, Claude Opus 5, GPT‑5.6 Sol, Qwen3.6‑27B, and Qwen3.6‑35B‑A3B demonstrate that this approach consistently creates harder environments and boosts terminal‑agent performance on Terminal‑Bench 2.1 by 14.4–18.0 percentage points.
By Zhiyuan Fan, Tinghao Yu, Yuanjun Cai, Jiang Zhou, Jiangtao Guan, Jincheng Liu, Yun Yang, Dingxin Hu, Zhuo Han, Xing Wu, Feng Zhang, Lilin Wang