arXiv Machine Learning

Stagewise Anomaly Detection for E-Transaxle Quality Monitoring Using Wavelet and STFT Features

arXiv AI
Jun 4

TPA-AD: A Two-Stage Pseudo Anomaly-Guided Method for Bearing Time-Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv:2606. 04073v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper proposes a two-stage pseudo anomaly-guided anomaly detection method (\textbf{T}wo-stage \textbf{P}seudo \textbf{A}nomaly-guided \textbf{A}nomaly \textbf{D}etection, \textbf{TPA-AD}) for axle-box bearing time-series anomaly detection (time series anomaly detection, TSAD) under the setting where only normal samples are available for training.

By Xiancheng Wang, Zhibo Zhang, Ran Li, Rui Wang, Minghang Zhao, Shisheng Zhong, Lin Wang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 2

Fast and Accurate Anomaly Detection in Time Series

Anomaly detection is a critical and evolving field in Machine Learning, with applications targeting different domains such as cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, manufacturing and IoT (Internet of Things) systems. Traditionally, anomaly detection algorithms have been designed using both supervised and unsupervised learning paradigms.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3

Fast and Accurate Anomaly Detection in Time Series

arXiv:2607. 02046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Anomaly detection is a critical and evolving field in Machine Learning, with applications targeting different domains such as cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, manufacturing and IoT (Internet of Things) systems.

By Emanuele Mele, Massimo Cafaro, Angelo Coluccia, Italo Epicoco
arXiv AI
Jun 12

CRAFTIIF: Cross-Resolution Analytic Four-Type Interpretable Isolation Forest for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv:2606. 13486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Anomaly detection in multivariate time series is challenged by four structurally distinct anomaly types -- point (isolated spikes), distributional (level shifts), temporal (rhythm changes), and collective (inter-sensor correlation breakdowns) -- each requiring different feature representations.

By William Smits
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 16

Robust Fault Detection in Mechanical Multimodal Time Series via Self-Supervised Cross-Modal Reconstruction

The paper introduces a multimodal anomaly detection framework that uses cross‑modal reconstruction of heterogeneous time‑series sensor data to detect faults in industrial systems. By learning to reconstruct each modality from the others, the method leverages complementary information across sensing channels without requiring explicit temporal alignment or identical sampling rates. An adaptive test‑time thresholding mechanism further improves robustness to distribution shifts caused by changing operating conditions, as demonstrated by strong fault detection performance in three industrial case studies, especially under out‑of‑distribution regimes.

By Magnus Munk Jensen, Dorte Hammersh{\o}i, Rafa{\l} Wi\'sniewski, Olga Fink
arXiv AI
Sep 25

A Multi-level Information Integration Framework for Physically Verifiable Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery

The paper proposes a Diagnostic Evidence Network (DENet) that augments traditional fault‑diagnosis outputs with structured evidence, including classification, predicted characteristic frequency, and temporal localization of impulses. This evidence aligns with theoretical bearing physics and can be validated at inference time, achieving high AUROC for misclassification detection without sacrificing accuracy. A QLoRA‑adapted language model then translates DENet’s evidence into maintenance reports, markedly reducing unsupported claims.

By Yuntong Chen, Jianyu Liu, Yingqi Li, Guobin Zhao, Ziang Wang, Chao Chen, Xitian Tian, Lijiang Huang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 26

A Hybrid Two-Stage Machine Learning Pipeline for Fault Detection and Classification in Power Transmission Systems

The paper introduces a hybrid two‑stage machine learning pipeline for fault detection and classification in high‑voltage transmission networks. Stage 1 uses an Isolation Forest anomaly detector combined with an optional supervised binary detector, while Stage 2 applies a Random Forest multiclass classifier only to samples flagged by Stage 1. Feature engineering maps six raw channels to eighteen features, including zero‑sequence symmetrical components, achieving end‑to‑end accuracies of 95.8 % on the TLFaultDataset and 97.25 % on an independent single‑point dataset, surpassing federated benchmarks without GPU or federated infrastructure.

By Sahil Manikshete, Atharva Gujarathi, Thanh Long Vu, Akhtar Hussain, Van-Hai Bui