arXiv:2606. 26317v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings in rotating machinery is considered essential for ensuring industrial safety and enabling predictive maintenance.
By Rajeev Kumar
arXiv:2606. 04073v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper proposes a two-stage pseudo anomaly-guided anomaly detection method (\textbf{T}wo-stage \textbf{P}seudo \textbf{A}nomaly-guided \textbf{A}nomaly \textbf{D}etection, \textbf{TPA-AD}) for axle-box bearing time-series anomaly detection (time series anomaly detection, TSAD) under the setting where only normal samples are available for training.
By Xiancheng Wang, Zhibo Zhang, Ran Li, Rui Wang, Minghang Zhao, Shisheng Zhong, Lin Wang
Anomaly detection is a critical and evolving field in Machine Learning, with applications targeting different domains such as cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, manufacturing and IoT (Internet of Things) systems. Traditionally, anomaly detection algorithms have been designed using both supervised and unsupervised learning paradigms.
arXiv:2509. 03070v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This letter presents a CWT-enhanced vibration sensing framework for bearing fault monitoring through localized time-frequency region detection on continuous wavelet transform (CWT) spectrograms.
By Po-Heng Chou, Wei-Lung Mao, Ru-Ping Lin, Jen-Yu Chiu, Chun-Yu Yeh
arXiv:2607. 02046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Anomaly detection is a critical and evolving field in Machine Learning, with applications targeting different domains such as cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, manufacturing and IoT (Internet of Things) systems.
By Emanuele Mele, Massimo Cafaro, Angelo Coluccia, Italo Epicoco
arXiv:2606. 13486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Anomaly detection in multivariate time series is challenged by four structurally distinct anomaly types -- point (isolated spikes), distributional (level shifts), temporal (rhythm changes), and collective (inter-sensor correlation breakdowns) -- each requiring different feature representations.
By William Smits
The paper introduces a multimodal anomaly detection framework that uses cross‑modal reconstruction of heterogeneous time‑series sensor data to detect faults in industrial systems. By learning to reconstruct each modality from the others, the method leverages complementary information across sensing channels without requiring explicit temporal alignment or identical sampling rates. An adaptive test‑time thresholding mechanism further improves robustness to distribution shifts caused by changing operating conditions, as demonstrated by strong fault detection performance in three industrial case studies, especially under out‑of‑distribution regimes.
By Magnus Munk Jensen, Dorte Hammersh{\o}i, Rafa{\l} Wi\'sniewski, Olga Fink
arXiv:2608. 08301v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable identification of railway wheel defects is important for safety and maintenance.
By Aashish Shaju, Steve Southward, Mehdi Ahmadian
arXiv:2606. 05274v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electro-Hydrostatic Actuators (EHAs) are widely used in aerospace and industrial systems, where timely detection of sensor anomalies is essential to ensure safe and reliable operation.
By Nehal Afifi, Abdelmonem Elhendawi, Felix Leitenberger, Nadine Piat, Sven Matthiesen
The paper proposes a Diagnostic Evidence Network (DENet) that augments traditional fault‑diagnosis outputs with structured evidence, including classification, predicted characteristic frequency, and temporal localization of impulses. This evidence aligns with theoretical bearing physics and can be validated at inference time, achieving high AUROC for misclassification detection without sacrificing accuracy. A QLoRA‑adapted language model then translates DENet’s evidence into maintenance reports, markedly reducing unsupported claims.
By Yuntong Chen, Jianyu Liu, Yingqi Li, Guobin Zhao, Ziang Wang, Chao Chen, Xitian Tian, Lijiang Huang
The paper introduces a hybrid two‑stage machine learning pipeline for fault detection and classification in high‑voltage transmission networks. Stage 1 uses an Isolation Forest anomaly detector combined with an optional supervised binary detector, while Stage 2 applies a Random Forest multiclass classifier only to samples flagged by Stage 1. Feature engineering maps six raw channels to eighteen features, including zero‑sequence symmetrical components, achieving end‑to‑end accuracies of 95.8 % on the TLFaultDataset and 97.25 % on an independent single‑point dataset, surpassing federated benchmarks without GPU or federated infrastructure.
By Sahil Manikshete, Atharva Gujarathi, Thanh Long Vu, Akhtar Hussain, Van-Hai Bui
arXiv:2605. 20088v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Discovering shapelets -- i.
By Seongjun Lee, Seokhyun Lee, Changhee Lee