arXiv Machine Learning

Fisher8: Stabilizing Neural Heteroscedastic Regression via Output-Layer Fisher Geometry

arXiv:2608. 10374v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training neural networks to jointly predict mean and uncertainty estimates from noisy observations can be unstable, prompting a series of independent stabilization efforts.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

GradientStabilizer:Fix the Norm, Not the Gradient

arXiv:2502. 17055v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training instability in modern deep learning systems is frequently triggered by rare but extreme gradient-norm spikes, which can induce oversized parameter updates, corrupt optimizer state, and lead to slow recovery or divergence.

By Tianjin Huang, Zhangyang Wang, Haotian Hu, Zhenyu Zhang, Gaojie Jin, Xiang Li, Li Shen, Jiaxing Shang, Tianlong Chen, Ke Li, Lu Liu, Qingsong Wen, Shiwei Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

Generalization in Nonlinear Least Squares via Learned Feature Geometry

arXiv:2606. 08799v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the generalization of ridge-regularized nonlinear least-squares models via on-average algorithmic stability, deriving error bounds for local minimizers in terms of a data-dependent effective dimension that reflects the geometry of the gradient model at the trained parameters, through the empirical Jacobian Gram matrix and a residual--curvature term.

By Ayub Kharel, Ilja Kuzborski, Patrick Rebeschini, Yasin Abbasi-Yadkori
arXiv AI
Jun 30

Representation Learning for Equivariant Inference with Guarantees

arXiv:2505. 19809v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In many real-world applications of regression, conditional probability estimation, and uncertainty quantification, exploiting symmetries rooted in physics or geometry can dramatically improve generalization and sample efficiency.

By Daniel Ordo\~nez-Apraez, Vladimir Kosti\'c, Alek Fr\"ohlich, Vivien Brandt, Karim Lounici, Massimiliano Pontil
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

How Far is Adam from Natural Gradient Descent?

The paper investigates how Adam’s update rule relates to natural gradient descent (NGD) by treating Adam as a diagonal empirical Fisher approximation with additional factors such as diagonal truncation, empirical label substitution, and temporal lag. Using a scale‑invariant metric, the authors quantify Adam’s geometric deviation from true NGD across four loss landscapes—well‑conditioned and ill‑conditioned linear regression, logistic regression, and a small neural network—finding that deviation is low in well‑conditioned settings but can reach about 10³ in ill‑conditioned or non‑convex scenarios. Despite higher geometric drift correlating with slower early optimization, Adam still achieves low final loss, and the improved empirical Fisher (iEF) yields more stable trajectories than the standard empirical Fisher (EF).

By Vihaan Paka-Hegde