Training neural networks to jointly predict mean and uncertainty estimates from noisy observations can be unstable, prompting a series of independent stabilization efforts. We argue that these interventions highlight a common underlying issue where gradient steps are poorly aligned with the geometry of the loss landscape.
arXiv:2606. 17513v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural operators provide fast surrogates for PDEs but their deterministic predictions limit their use in tasks requiring uncertainty quantification (UQ), especially under geometric variability.
By Oriol Vendrell-Gallart, Nima Negarandeh, Ramin Bostanabad
arXiv:2608. 07630v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We adapt two classical statistical estimators for quantifying uncertainty to modern deep learning, in order to provide clearer insights into uncertainty attributable to two sources : aleatoric uncertainty, or locally scarce data.
By Pierre Nodet, Thomas George
arXiv:2502. 17055v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training instability in modern deep learning systems is frequently triggered by rare but extreme gradient-norm spikes, which can induce oversized parameter updates, corrupt optimizer state, and lead to slow recovery or divergence.
By Tianjin Huang, Zhangyang Wang, Haotian Hu, Zhenyu Zhang, Gaojie Jin, Xiang Li, Li Shen, Jiaxing Shang, Tianlong Chen, Ke Li, Lu Liu, Qingsong Wen, Shiwei Liu
arXiv:2608. 04442v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robustness to natural corruptions remains a fundamental challenge for deep neural networks.
By Jiangang Yang, Wenhui Shi, Lu Hu, Jing Xing, Jian Liu
arXiv:2607. 05536v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Randomized smoothing has emerged as a scalable technique for certifying the adversarial robustness of classifiers.
By Jie Zhang, Natalie Frank
arXiv:2606. 08799v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the generalization of ridge-regularized nonlinear least-squares models via on-average algorithmic stability, deriving error bounds for local minimizers in terms of a data-dependent effective dimension that reflects the geometry of the gradient model at the trained parameters, through the empirical Jacobian Gram matrix and a residual--curvature term.
By Ayub Kharel, Ilja Kuzborski, Patrick Rebeschini, Yasin Abbasi-Yadkori
arXiv:2605. 25811v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study counterfactual distribution learning for high-dimensional outcomes whose laws may concentrate near lower-dimensional structure.
By Kwangho Kim
arXiv:2605. 29547v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning optimization relies heavily on the assumption of smooth loss landscapes, a condition systematically violated by modern architectures due to non-smooth components such as ReLU activations and quantization operators.
By Ruoran Xu, Borong She, Xiaobo Jin, Qiufeng Wang
arXiv:2609.38540v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A valid curvature upper bound need not justify either a robustness certificate or an intervention on an intrinsic predictor property. We demonstrate th...
By Vicente Opazo, Jose Calatayud-Mateu, Cristobal Rojas, Cristian Buc Calderon
arXiv:2505. 19809v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In many real-world applications of regression, conditional probability estimation, and uncertainty quantification, exploiting symmetries rooted in physics or geometry can dramatically improve generalization and sample efficiency.
By Daniel Ordo\~nez-Apraez, Vladimir Kosti\'c, Alek Fr\"ohlich, Vivien Brandt, Karim Lounici, Massimiliano Pontil
The paper investigates how Adam’s update rule relates to natural gradient descent (NGD) by treating Adam as a diagonal empirical Fisher approximation with additional factors such as diagonal truncation, empirical label substitution, and temporal lag. Using a scale‑invariant metric, the authors quantify Adam’s geometric deviation from true NGD across four loss landscapes—well‑conditioned and ill‑conditioned linear regression, logistic regression, and a small neural network—finding that deviation is low in well‑conditioned settings but can reach about 10³ in ill‑conditioned or non‑convex scenarios. Despite higher geometric drift correlating with slower early optimization, Adam still achieves low final loss, and the improved empirical Fisher (iEF) yields more stable trajectories than the standard empirical Fisher (EF).
By Vihaan Paka-Hegde