The paper introduces iDriveVLA, a multi‑modal planning framework for autonomous driving that addresses a generation‑evaluation asymmetry by improving candidate trajectory spaces and providing a unified, safety‑aware evaluator. It combines a Safety‑aware Scorer for risk estimation with a VLM‑guided Modulator that adapts weighting to the scene, and employs an oracle‑aligned progressive training strategy. On the NAVSIM v1 leaderboard, iDriveVLA achieves a new state‑of‑the‑art PDMS score of 94.95, surpassing human‑expert performance.
By Zeyu He, Shiqi Liu, Ke Chen, Yun Yan, Jinzi Wu, Dianqiao Lei, Sirui Wang, ShuRui Peng, Tao Chen, Zhuo Huang, Yu Wu, Yadong Shao, Zhichao Li, Ke Sun, Yang Guan, Keqiang Li, Shengbo Eben Li
arXiv:2606. 21165v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present OmniV2X, a generative foundation model for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) cooperative driving.
By Juntong Peng, Juanwu Lu, Yupeng Zhou, Can Cui, Yaobin Chen, Ziran Wang
arXiv:2508. 16947v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite significant progress, imitation learning-based autonomous driving planners remain largely restricted to reproducing high-frequency biased behaviors, overlooking the inherent behavioral diversity of human driving.
By Fan Ding, Xuewen Luo, Fucai Ke, Hwa Hui Tew, Susilawati Susilawati, Vishnu Monn Baskaran, Junn Yong Loo
arXiv:2606. 24231v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal driving planning faces a long-standing tension between two paradigms: scoring-based methods benefit from dense reward supervision but are confined to a fixed action vocabulary, while anchor-based methods generate proposals dynamically yet suffer from sparse supervision constrained to a single ground-truth trajectory.
By Xirui Li, Zhe Liu, Xiaoqing Ye, Wenhua Han, Yifeng Pan, Junyu Han, Hengshuang Zhao
arXiv:2609.15322v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Pretrained driving vision-language models (VLMs) integrate visual, route, language, and driving context into rich driving priors, yet their represent...
By Changxin Lu, Xiaoliang Meng, Yu Wu, Rui Huang, Honglin Li, Tao Chen, Kaixuan Zhou, Yadong Shao
SimWAM is a lightweight World-Action Model that uses future‑video prediction only during training to supervise an action expert, enabling end‑to‑end autonomous driving without costly test‑time future imagination. The architecture co‑trains a pretrained video expert and a lightweight action expert via joint flow matching, while an isolated attention mask keeps action prediction independent of future frames. This design allows the video backbone to be swapped and the action expert scaled independently, achieving 91.5 PDMS on NAVSIM, outperforming state‑of‑the‑art WAM planners with lower latency and zero‑shot transfer to nuScenes.
By Zongchuang Zhao, Xin Zhou, Tianyang Xu, Zhengyang Sun, Kaixuan Zhou, Yu Wu, Honglin Li, Dingkang Liang, Xiang Bai
arXiv:2606. 11569v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Closed-loop planning in complex, real-world driving scenarios presents a critical challenge for autonomous driving systems.
By Qichao Zhang, Xing Fang, Jiaqi Fang, Zhenwen Cai, Jie Ling, Qiankun Yu, Dongbin Zhao
arXiv:2607. 03182v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous driving planning requires translating navigation intent, traffic rules, dynamic interactions, and language instructions into executable continuous trajectories.
By Qi Liu, Yabei Li, Hongsong Wang, Heng Zhang, Lei He
arXiv:2608.30122v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) driving methods increasingly combine multi-trajectory imitation learning with group-relative policy optimization (GRPO),...
By Tian Zhang, Zhuo Huang, Hongrui Ye, Yu Wu, Zengmao Wang, Kaixuan Zhou
arXiv:2606. 06219v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: End-to-end autonomous driving models often struggle to balance multi-modal maneuver generation with real-time inference constraints.
By Yining Xing, Zehong Ke, Zhiyuan Liu, Yanbo Jiang, Wenhao Yu, Jianqiang Wang
arXiv:2601.01762v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Practical autonomous driving requires models that generalize by reasoning through spatial-temporal possibilities to exclude unsafe outcomes....
By Yanhao Wu, Haoyang Zhang, Fei He, Rui Wu, Yanhu Shan, Congpei Qiu, Liang Gao, Wei Ke, Tong Zhang
arXiv:2604. 16557v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current post-training methodologies for adapting Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) generally fall into two paradigms: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL).
By Yuming Yan, Kai Tang, Sihong Chen, Ke Xu, Dan Hu, Qun Yu, Pengfei Hu