SkinAgent AI is a multimodal, safety‑grounded framework designed for non‑diagnostic skincare support. It routes visual concerns (Acne, Pores, Wrinkles), estimates skin type from photographs, and provides count‑informed acne severity, all while grounding recommendations in a database and enforcing deterministic safety, privacy, and evidence checks. The system achieved high accuracy in routing and skin‑type estimation, and demonstrated no safety or privacy violations in controlled tests, though tool‑selection errors and incomplete product grounding remain.
arXiv:2607. 01252v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background: Dermatology AI has mainly focused on image-based diagnosis, while chronic disease workflows have received less attention.
arXiv:2609.24190v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) has advanced at a rapid pace in recent years. Initially, breakthroughs in large language models caught widespread attentio...
CG-HAF is a global‑local fusion framework for ordinal acne severity grading that explicitly combines holistic facial severity probabilities with structured lesion‑burden descriptors such as lesion count, detection confidence, and lesion area. The model uses a lightweight, interpretable classifier to produce the final grade, achieving statistically significant improvements over global‑evidence‑only baselines, especially for severe cases. Cross‑dataset testing reveals that strong performance within a dataset does not automatically transfer, largely due to mismatched grading criteria rather than detection failures.
arXiv:2609.36400v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep learning classifiers for dermoscopic skin lesions often reach high in-distribution accuracy while quietly relying on spurious background cues su...
arXiv:2608. 07091v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Edge Artificial Intelligence (Edge AI) enables the deployment of AI models directly on local edge devices, while such deployments are subject to strict resource constraints, particularly in clinical applications requiring local and timely inference.
arXiv:2607. 29405v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI systems act through multi-step trajectories that combine planning, tool use, memory, interaction, and adaptation.
The study examines why dermatology AI models, largely trained on light‑skinned, cancer‑focused images, perform poorly when applied to diverse patient populations. By comparing a cancer‑trained baseline, two dermatology foundation models, and a general‑purpose vision model on tone‑stratified and disease‑shifted datasets, the authors find that disease‑distribution shift, rather than skin‑tone underrepresentation, is the primary cause of generalization failure. Representation analysis shows that cancer‑specialized features lack transferable structure, while dermatology‑pretrained features maintain stronger clustering, and lightweight adaptation with about ten labeled examples per category can recover most performance.
arXiv:2607. 25485v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Health AI is evolving from answering questions to agentic systems that converse with patients, reason about health records, and act on their behalf.
Acne vulgaris affects most adolescents and many adults. Accurate severity grading guides treatment, monitoring, and clinical trial endpoints, but manual assessment using the Investigator's Global Assessment or Hayashi criteria is limited by inter-rater variability and inconsistent imaging conditions.
arXiv:2607. 19356v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-using LLM agents increasingly execute high-impact actions, making runtime safety monitoring essential.
arXiv:2608.22510v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent benchmarks often evaluate only final answers even when agents run on stateful runtimes. We argue this under-specifies what is being evaluated: th...
arXiv:2608.23313v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language model safety benchmarks typically evaluate only final responses: whether a model refuses, warns, or complies. This outcome-level view c...