arXiv AI

Can Machine Learning Potentials Be More Accurate Than the Methods They Are Trained On?

The article discusses how machine learning potentials (MLPs) can surpass the accuracy of the quantum‑chemical methods they are trained on by generalizing across a third space—different quantum‑chemical methods. It proposes the development of method‑transferable MLPs that predict properties at unseen methods, demonstrating that such models can outperform any of their training methods in both density‑functional and wavefunction‑based theories. The authors argue that pursuing accuracy beyond the training methods could enable universal MLPs to exceed single‑method models, influencing dataset construction and model evaluation to push chemical simulation limits.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 12

Electron-Density-Informed Molecular Property Prediction Using Surrogate Functionals

The paper introduces a machine‑learning approach that incorporates the ground‑state electron density as input while enforcing it to be the minimum of a surrogate functional derived from orbital‑free density functional theory. This method outperforms state‑of‑the‑art models on six of seven extensive properties in the QM9 dataset and shows better generalization to larger molecules in the QM40 dataset. Models that use the density without enforcing the surrogate functional constraints perform worse on all extensive properties of both datasets.

By Manuel V. Klockow, Simon Wagner, Roman Remme, Dominic Plein, Fred A. Hamprecht
arXiv AI
Sep 17

BOOM: Benchmarking Out-Of-distribution Molecular Property Predictions of Machine Learning Models

BOOM is a new benchmark for evaluating out‑of‑distribution (OOD) molecular property predictions in machine learning. It provides chemically‑informed tests across common property prediction tasks and assesses over 150 model‑task combinations. The study shows that current models, including chemical foundation models, struggle to generalize OOD, with the best model still exhibiting three times higher error than in‑distribution predictions.

By Evan R. Antoniuk, Shehtab Zaman, Tal Ben-Nun, Peggy Li, James Diffenderfer, Busra Sahin, Obadiah Smolenski, Everett Grethel, Tim Hsu, Anna M. Hiszpanski, Kenneth Chiu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Brian Van Essen
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 1

ElemeNet: Multiscale Molecular Machine Learning with Uncertainty Quantification Across the Periodic Table

arXiv:2606. 30961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advances in deep learning architectures and representations have enabled ML-driven chemical property prediction, but state-of-the-art (SOTA) models have remained largely confined to independent codebases and lack support for diverse chemical species.

By Jacob W. Toney, Samir Darouich, Yiran Wang, Aaron G. Garrison, Johannes K\"astner, Heather J. Kulik
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13

Is data-efficient learning feasible with quantum models?

arXiv:2508. 19437v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The importance of analyzing nontrivial datasets when testing quantum machine learning (QML) models is becoming increasingly prominent in literature, yet a cohesive framework for understanding dataset characteristics remains elusive.

By Alona Sakhnenko, Christian B. Mendl, Jeanette M. Lorenz
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

$\mathtt{Q^2SAR}$: overcoming classical bottlenecks in drug discovery via quantum multiple kernel learning

arXiv:2607. 11701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship ($\mathtt{QSAR}$) modeling is a foundational computational methodology in early-stage drug discovery, heavily relied upon for predicting compound toxicity, bioavailability, and therapeutic potential.

By Mariano Caruso, Daniel Ruiz, Alejandro Giraldo, Guido Bellomo