arXiv:2607. 14543v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as the reasoning backbone of embodied agents, enabling robots to interpret visual scenes, follow language instructions, and plan multi-step actions.
By Huaigang Yang, Ya Li, Min Ren, Bo Dai, Zhenliang Zhang, Zhaofeng He
arXiv:2607. 00218v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are now proposed as runtime safety guards for embodied agents in homes and factories.
By Siddhant Panpatil, Arth Singh, Mijin Koo, Chaeyun Kim, Haon Park, Dasol Choi
arXiv:2609.36562v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains, their reliability is threatened by multimodal im...
By Ruochen Zhang, Yao Huang, Yitong Sun, Jiahe Xie, Jin Yan, Jifan Ma, Yuanfang Guo, Xingxing Wei
arXiv:2609.22234v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Instruction hierarchy (IH) alignment teaches language models to prioritize higher-level instructions when inputs conflict. While studied primarily in...
By Nicholas Sansoterra, Zishuo Zheng, Sachin Kumar
Aligned vision‑language models (VLMs) are designed to combine grounded visual reasoning with safe generation. The study finds that when safety constraints are applied, these models often abstain from answering questions that they could answer under default instruction, yet visual evidence continues to influence the decoding process. The authors show that safety‑induced abstention alters late‑stage hidden‑state dynamics, and that targeted interventions can restore grounded answering without retraining or changing visual inputs.
GuardEn is an executable safeguard framework that transforms complex safety policies into atomic propositions via Safety‑Rule Compilation and models their composition as executable code. At inference, Scene‑Grounded Execution uses visual scene graphs to instantiate these propositions, allowing rule‑grounded and interpretable safety reasoning. Experiments on SafetyVisionBench show GuardEn improves F1 by an average of 9.8 points over the strongest baseline.
By Jisoo Kim (Sungkyunkwan University), TaeYoon Kwack (Sungkyunkwan University), Jinwoo Jang (Sungkyunkwan University), Honguk Woo (Sungkyunkwan University)
arXiv:2610.07514v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A vision-language model may need to combine an image with a prompt to recognize a safety risk that neither reveals alone. Where does this joint safety...
By Faezeh Dehghan Tarzjani, Mevan Wijewardena, Alexander Romanus, Sampad Mohanty
The paper introduces Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields (CNRF), an evidence‑grounded framework that improves safety for vision‑language models (VLMs). CNRF builds context‑matched benign‑harmful counterfactual pairs, uses their representation differences to define risk directions, and separates neighborhood support from risk estimation. This approach allows selective intervention rather than blanket rejection, achieving high macro defense success rates across multiple VLMs while preserving benign‑task utility.
By Tianshi Wang, Jingsong Wang, Fengling Li, Jingjing Li, Xin Li, Lei Zhu
arXiv:2606. 24759v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for autonomous driving scene understanding, yet existing methods still face a fundamental trade-off between temporal reasoning and spatial precision.
By Xiaowei Gao, Pengxiang Li, Yitai Cheng, Ruihan Xu, James Haworth, Stephen Law, Yun Ye
MM-IFEval-Pro is a new multilingual benchmark for evaluating instruction-following in vision-language models, covering both Chinese and English tasks. It includes 4 major task categories, 24 subcategories, and 8 instruction categories with 52 subcategories, each sample featuring an average of 3.0 constraints to mimic complex instruction scenarios. A reinforcement-learning training set with Chinese and adversarial instructions improves model performance on MM-IFEval-Pro and transfers well to other multimodal benchmarks, showing strong cross-task and cross-language generalization.
By Changming Xiao, Zhenliang Ni, Jinhui He, Han Shu, Jie Hu
arXiv:2609.13458v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Embodied language grounding requires more than identifying the referent of an instruction: recovered semantics must also control the action an agent...
By Baosheng Jin, Yushen Liang, Hua Shen
arXiv:2606. 05177v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing multimodal safety benchmarks focus solely on visual inputs and cannot assess Omni Large Language Models (LLMs) that process vision, audio, and text.
By Manh Luong, Tamas Abraham, Junae Kim, Amar Kaur, Rollin Omari, Gholamreza Haffari, Trang Vu, Lizhen Qu, Dinh Phung