arXiv AI

Free-Text Evaluation of LLMs for 5G Domain Knowledge and Fault Analysis using LLM-as-Judge

The paper evaluates lightweight, edge‑deployable large language models—Claude‑Haiku‑4.5, GPT‑5.4‑Mini, and Gemini‑3.1‑Flash‑Lite—on free‑text 5G domain knowledge and fault‑analysis tasks using three benchmarks (TeleQNA ORAN FT, 5G‑Faults FT, TeleInter FT). All models achieve at least 90% accuracy on fault diagnosis, but zero‑shot recall of 3GPP and O‑RAN specifications remains below 60%. Multi‑judge scoring yields a mean inter‑judge agreement of at least 0.90, and Gemini‑3.1‑Flash‑Lite emerges as the most efficient model for production telecom deployments.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

TelecomGPT-R1: A Unified Open-Source Reasoner for the Telecom Stack

TelecomGPT‑R1‑9B is an open‑source large language model designed specifically for telecom reasoning tasks. It was trained on a 67,427‑example supervised fine‑tuning corpus that covers protocol, knowledge, modeling, and fault reasoning, and further refined with a two‑stage post‑training process involving low‑rank adaptation and policy optimization. The model tops the GSMA open telco leaderboard and matches state‑of‑the‑art closed‑source reasoners across seven public telecom benchmarks.

By Bohao Wang, Chenwei Wu, Haoyu Li, Hang Zou, Yu Tian, Lina Bariah, Li Wei, Chongwen Huang, Yongliang Shen, Zhaoyang Zhang, Merouane Debbah
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2

CRAFT: Fine-Tuning Pre-hoc Explainability in AI-native 6G RAN

The paper introduces CRAFT, a data‑centric fine‑tuning approach that aligns small language models (SLMs) for pre‑hoc reasoning in AI‑native 6G radio access networks (RAN). By automatically generating verified (input, trace, label) triplets and fine‑tuning with low‑rank adaptation, CRAFT achieves high accuracy and F1 scores on TRACTOR and IC xApp datasets while avoiding parse failures that plague RL methods like GRPO. It also reduces energy consumption by 59% compared to GRPO baselines, offering a more sustainable path to auditable AI in 6G RAN.

By Pranshav Gajjar, Vijay K Shah
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Large Language Models (LLMs) for Telecom Root Cause Analysis (RCA): A Structured Reasoning Framework for Evidence-Grounded Diagnosis

The paper introduces a structured reasoning framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) for root cause analysis (RCA) in telecom networks. It organizes heterogeneous network telemetry into canonical contexts, enforces decision‑path reasoning, and produces evidence‑grounded explanations to improve fault identification. Experiments on two 5G RCA datasets, TeleLogs and TelecomTS, show that this approach consistently outperforms baseline techniques in diagnostic accuracy and decision consistency.

By Hao Zhou (Jianzhong), Mandar Kulkarni (Jianzhong), Hao Chen (Jianzhong), Yan Xin (Jianzhong), Charlie (Jianzhong), Zhang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

Large Language Models (LLMs) for Telecom Root Cause Analysis (RCA): A Structured Reasoning Framework for Evidence-Grounded Diagnosis

The paper discusses the challenges of root cause analysis (RCA) in 5G and 6G telecom networks, where complex cross-layer dependencies make diagnosis difficult. It reviews the progression from rule‑based and machine‑learning RCA methods to emerging large language model (LLM) approaches, highlighting issues such as hallucination and unstable reasoning when using vanilla LLMs. The authors propose a structured reasoning framework that organizes network telemetry into canonical contexts, enforces decision‑path reasoning, and generates evidence‑grounded explanations, showing improved diagnostic accuracy on two 5G RCA datasets.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 27

FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets

FaulT-Bench is a new benchmark comprising 200 network troubleshooting scenarios across eight topologies, designed to test large‑language‑model agents on realistic, noisy tickets that may contain false premises or incorrect fault claims. The benchmark includes 72 rewritten tickets that vary reporter confidence and detail, and evaluates agents via an automated harness that scores diagnoses on outcome, fix, and reasoning quality. Results show that while agents perform well on accurate tickets, they degrade sharply on healthy networks with misleading reports, highlighting the importance of ticket wording over content.

arXiv AI
Aug 28

FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets

FaulT-Bench is a new benchmark comprising 200 network troubleshooting scenarios across eight topologies, designed to test large‑language‑model agents on realistic, noisy user tickets that may contain false premises or incorrect fault claims. The benchmark includes 72 rewritten tickets that vary reporter confidence and detail while keeping the network state constant, allowing isolation of the impact of ticket wording on diagnosis. Evaluation of agents such as SADE, ReAct, and Claude Code shows they perform well on accurate tickets but degrade sharply on misleading or healthy‑network tickets, revealing differing failure modes and highlighting the importance of robust reasoning over unreliable input.

By Kuan-Hao Tseng, Niruth Bogahawatta, Yasod Ginige, Kunjan Patel, Kosta Dakic, Suranga Seneviratne
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Loom: Weaving Diagnostic Strands into Free-Text Consensus via Embedding-Space Reweighting

Loom is a generative consensus framework designed for real‑world root‑cause analysis (RCA) that combines open‑form hypotheses from modular heuristics with a lightweight large language model (LLM) synthesis step. It projects hypotheses into a continuous embedding space and uses an iterative centroid‑based reweighting algorithm to resolve conflicts, producing a single consensus that is then synthesized by one LLM call. On the OpenRCA benchmark Loom matches state‑of‑the‑art autonomous agents on some datasets while achieving significantly higher efficiency—about 26× faster and 33× faster with an 8B‑parameter synthesizer. whyItMatters":"Loom demonstrates how embedding‑space reweighting can bridge the gap between statistical rigor and expressive LLMs, enabling efficient, trustworthy RCA in industrial settings."

By Ron Begleiter, Katya Egert Berg, Gilad Saban, Gil Shabat
arXiv AI
Aug 28

AgentJudgeBench: A Multi-Difficulty Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Judges on Agentic Tool-Calling

AgentJudgeBench is a new benchmark that evaluates the reliability of large language model (LLM) judges on agentic tool‑calling tasks involving workflow directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). It contains 3,808 instances across six DAG topologies and three difficulty tiers, tested with five generators (3B–70B open‑weight models and GPT‑5.4) and six judges (20B to frontier scale) under both paired‑with‑and‑without‑ground‑truth conditions. The study finds that judge alignment degrades with task difficulty, ground‑truth exposure can sometimes hurt alignment, and structured evaluation rubrics provide modest improvements, revealing a structural ceiling that model capacity alone cannot surpass.

By Abhigya Verma, Amit Kumar Saha, Seganrasan Subramanian, Sai Harshitha Aluru