arXiv AI By Ron Begleiter, Katya Egert Berg, Gilad Saban, Gil Shabat

Loom: Weaving Diagnostic Strands into Free-Text Consensus via Embedding-Space Reweighting

Read the original on arXiv AI →

Loom is a generative consensus framework designed for real‑world root‑cause analysis (RCA) that combines open‑form hypotheses from modular heuristics with a lightweight large language model (LLM) synthesis step. It projects hypotheses into a continuous embedding space and uses an iterative centroid‑based reweighting algorithm to resolve conflicts, producing a single consensus that is then synthesized by one LLM call. On the OpenRCA benchmark Loom matches state‑of‑the‑art autonomous agents on some datasets while achieving significantly higher efficiency—about 26× faster and 33× faster with an 8B‑parameter synthesizer. whyItMatters":"Loom demonstrates how embedding‑space reweighting can bridge the gap between statistical rigor and expressive LLMs, enabling efficient, trustworthy RCA in industrial settings."

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

Loom: Weaving Diagnostic Strands into Free-Text Consensus via Embedding-Space Reweighting

Loom is a generative consensus framework designed for real‑world root‑cause analysis (RCA) that combines open‑form hypotheses from modular heuristics with a lightweight large language model (LLM). It projects hypotheses into a continuous embedding space and uses an iterative centroid‑based reweighting algorithm to resolve conflicts, producing a single consensus that is then synthesized by one LLM call. On the OpenRCA benchmark, Loom achieves state‑of‑the‑art accuracy on Bank and Market‑2 while being significantly faster and more efficient than existing autonomous agents.

arXiv AI
6d ago

MABPD: Multi-Agent Bias Probing & Detection via Structured Argument Debate

MABPD (Multi‑Agent Bias Probing & Detection) is a training‑free pipeline that uses three specialized large language model agents to analyze news articles from complementary perspectives and resolve disagreements via a Structured Argument Debate (SAD) protocol. SAD imposes an asymmetric burden of proof—biased claims lacking grounded textual evidence receive zero weight—along with role‑weighted voting and post‑consensus verification, replacing task‑specific supervised decision boundaries. Ablation studies show that the debate module alone accounts for up to a 10.6‑point F1 gain, and on the BABE benchmark MABPD attains 83.4% macro F1, within 0.7 percentage points of the supervised state‑of‑the‑art, while achieving 75.0% zero‑shot accuracy on the SemEval 2019 HyperPartisan corpus.

By Garvit Joshi (Graphic Era University, Dehradun, India), Stavya Dhyani (Graphic Era University, Dehradun, India), Jasmine (Graphic Era University, Dehradun, India), Arun Chauhan (Graphic Era University, Dehradun, India)