arXiv:2607. 00763v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Digital forensic investigations of network intrusions require analytical outputs that are traceable, reproducible, and court-defensible - requirements existing machine learning pipelines do not satisfy, since they treat original evidence as training data and produce opaque classifications without instance-level justification.
By Jose Luis Vela Alonso, Carmen Pellicer
arXiv:2608. 01454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Provenance-based intrusion detection systems (PIDS) frequently report strong performance, but the conclusions drawn from these results can be highly sensitive to benchmarking choices and evaluation protocols.
By Lorenzo Guerra, Thomas Chapuis, Guillaume Duc, Pavlo Mozharovskyi, Van-Tam Nguyen
arXiv:2608. 15761v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Edge-IIoTset is the reference benchmark for machine-learning intrusion detection in the industrial Internet of Things, and results reported on it cluster above 99%.
By Mostafa M. Galal
arXiv:2610.15995v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: This paper presents AutoSec-RAN, a specification-grounded large language model (LLM) framework for automated security triage of Open Radio Access Net...
By Anoop Mishra, Joshua Moore, Aly Sabri Abdalla, Vuk Marojevic
arXiv:2606. 05844v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Rule-based Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS) offer precise attack detection as well as mitigation, however their manually crafted, signature-driven rules limit adaptability to emerging and zero-day threats.
By Hassan Jalil Hadi, Rehana Yasmin, Ali Shoker
The paper evaluates three AI model security scanners—ModelScan, ModelAudit, and Fickling—using a benchmark of 170 Pickle and PyTorch artifacts from 145 families, 135 of which have binary security labels. It distinguishes coverage metrics such as non‑N/A coverage, analysis completion, and definitive security decisions, finding that ModelAudit achieved 100% definitive decisions, Fickling 81.5%, and ModelScan 49.6%. When a definitive judgment was made, ModelScan reached perfect precision, recall, and F1, while Fickling added no unique true positives beyond those found by the other tools.
By Qianlong Lan, Vinothini Pandurangan, Anuj Kaul, Indranil Sanyal
arXiv:2608. 10349v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine-learning intrusion-detection studies commonly emphasize predictive accuracy while treating explanation generation as a computationally free post-processing step.
By Abdurrahman Tolay
arXiv:2606. 00155v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) are caught in a structural contradiction: the protocols carrying the highest threat intelligence are precisely those encrypted under TLS 1.
By Vivek Kumar Sharma
The paper introduces Combinatorial Lock, a training‑free, hardware‑friendly defense against multi‑trigger backdoor attacks in AI models. It transforms multi‑trigger detection into a combinatorial problem over binary activation signatures, using anomaly‑gated spectral scrubbing and hash‑compressed signatures verified by expert ensembles. Experiments on six popular architectures show the method reduces attack success rates to 0.1% while maintaining 97.8% clean accuracy, with modest latency overhead on ASIC and FPGA platforms.
By Soumita Chatterjee, Sudip Ghosh, Tamal Ghosh, Bhargab B. Bhattacharya, Hafizur Rahaman
arXiv:2508. 18684v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) detect malicious activity by matching network or host events against predefined rules.
By Shaswata Mitra, Subash Neupane, Martin Duclos, Sudip Mittal, Aritran Piplai, Md Rayhanur Rahman, Edward Zieglar, Shahram Rahimi
arXiv:2607. 26791v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly adopted in real-world security operations with access to host artifacts and command-line interfaces (CLIs), making it critical to thoroughly assess their security capabilities.
By Lehan Wang, Boli Chen, Ruixue Ding, Pengjun Xie, Jinwei Huang, Zhendong Liu, Shuo Wang, Tao Lei, Xin Ouyang, Xiaomeng Li
The paper investigates whether machine learning models for IoT intrusion detection truly learn attack patterns or rely on dataset shortcuts. Using the CyberFlowIoT-GICAP benchmark, the authors evaluate four learning paradigms across different feature sets and split strategies, finding that performance is largely driven by feature representation and that tree-based models can exploit temporal artifacts. The study also highlights asymmetric attack detectability and proposes a four-point protocol checklist for realistic evaluation.
By Uday Shankar Roy, Mahbuba Jahan Minu