arXiv AI

FeatureArc: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Evolving Features

FeatureArc is a new benchmark that evaluates coding agents on the evolution of software features, requiring agents to extend a feature across multiple stages while preserving earlier functionality. The benchmark uses a pipeline that constructs tasks from real repository histories, validates fail‑to‑pass and pass‑to‑pass tests, and covers four programming languages. In tests on 73 tasks, agents performed well on the first stage (62.7% success) but dropped to 28.5% when the entire feature was evaluated, with inherited defects causing most failures.

arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

FeatureLoop: Benchmarking Coding Agents under Evolving Requirements

FeatureLoop is a benchmark that evaluates coding agents on 61 human‑reviewed tasks drawn from 34 repositories in five programming languages. Each task tracks a development goal through iterative feedback—adding or clarifying requirements and reporting failures—while cumulative executable checks monitor new behavior, repairs, and preservation of earlier functionality. In tests of 12 state‑of‑the‑art models, the best agent completed 72.1% of tasks with both feedback types, but only 15.4% of failures were recovered within two revisions, highlighting issues such as incomplete repairs, regressions, and token inefficiency.

By Jia Feng, Alyssa Wu, Cuiyun Gao, Yunlong Wang, Songyuanyi Lu, Zhichao Hu
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Zero2Repo: Can Coding Agents Build Repositories from Scratch?

arXiv:2609.38269v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents are increasingly asked to build software rather than patch it, yet benchmarks for from-scratch repository construction are mostly limit...

By Pei Yang, Tianyu Shi, Yuhang Yao, Wanyi Chen, Tongyun Yang, Dun Pei, Haonan Wang, Pengbin Feng, Guanxu Yu, Jingchun Huang, Zeyu Zhang, Shuhan Sun, Hao Li, Xiang Li, Jie Xiao, Xinyu Wang, Hanxin Chen, Daqi Li, Qi Jia, Hongshan Lin, Zhizhou Gu, Zijun Tian, Weizhi Du, Lynn Ai, Eric Yang
arXiv AI
Oct 1

E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch

E2E-SWE is a benchmark that tests large language models’ ability to create complete, functional software repositories from scratch. It includes 186 tasks across 11 programming languages, each requiring an agent to build an installable project based solely on a natural‑language specification and an empty workspace, while passing a hidden test suite. The benchmark was crafted by software engineers and LLMs, then refined through iterative verification by autonomous agents to ensure clarity and solvability.

By Hantian Ding, Chloe Bi, Jiacheng Zhu, John Yang, Matt Deitke, Pengcheng Yin, Zijian Wang, Rui Hou
arXiv AI
Aug 11

A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents

arXiv:2608. 09072v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model-powered coding agents are increasingly used to modify existing code repositories, for example, by adding features or fixing bugs.

By Xin Zhou, Chun Yong Chong, Kisub Kim, Yun Peng, Rui Shu, Zihan Wu, Xu Han, Guowen Yuan, Zeyang Zhuang, Jounghoon Kim, Jeongjin Ju, Seongmin Ju, Taein Yoon, David Lo
arXiv AI
Oct 9

TestJack: Should you trust the results in coding benchmarks? Agentic Coding Benchmarks Auditing via Evaluator Evolution

TestJack is a scalable framework that audits large language model (LLM) coding agents by generating new tests for each trial, focusing on prompt requirements that may be violated. It keeps only the tests passed by the ground‑truth patch and re‑examines failures, providing replayable evidence for each confirmed error. In experiments across six model backends and five benchmarks, TestJack found that 34.4% of trials deemed correct actually violated task requirements, reducing the overall resolution rate from 50.6% to 33.2%.

By Shuangjie Yao, Hao Wang, Koushik Sen, Simin Chen, Baishakhi Ray, Dawn Song