arXiv AI

Distilling Directional Verification

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

Knowledge Distillation During Mid-Training Favors Reasoning over Factual Recall

arXiv:2609.01532v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Logit-based knowledge distillation (KD) is used to train smaller language models (LMs) via supervision from stronger teachers, but whether its benefits...

By Jacqueline He, Howard Yen, Shuyue Stella Li, Margaret Li, Hanqing Zeng, Yinglong Xia, Benyu Zhang, Zhuokai Zhao, Qiang Zhang, Pang Wei Koh, Luke Zettlemoyer, Wen-tau Yih
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Activation-Conditioned Self-Distillation

arXiv:2609.38342v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation uses a model as its own teacher to provide dense supervision for reasoning, often through reference-solution conditioning....

By Zhexi Lu, Subhajit Chaudhury, Tejaswini Pedapati, Keerthiram Murugesan, Lei Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 20

Rethinking Privileged Information in On-Policy Self-Distillation

The paper investigates on‑policy self‑distillation (OPSD), where a student model learns from its own outputs using token‑level supervision conditioned on privileged reference information. Experiments with Qwen3 models on science and mathematics datasets show that the correct reference does not consistently improve performance; students can improve without it, and solutions from other problems sometimes outperform the correct reference. The study finds that student predictions align more closely with the base model’s reasoning than with the reference supervision, and that alignment alone does not reliably predict performance gains.

By Samyak Shrestha, Alexander Tessier
arXiv AI
Sep 25

PROOF: Profiling Reliability of Object-Level Facts in Large Language Models

PROOF is a benchmark that profiles the reliability of object-level facts in instruction-tuned language models by converting a frozen Wikidata snapshot into 18,486 English multiple-choice questions grounded in 11,779 semantic facts across 101 classes, 392 properties, and 14 domains. Each question includes an explicit "I don't know" option, a "No correct option" control, and nine controlled formulations, with 1,849 questions designed as no-correct-option traps. The study evaluates 18 open-weight model deployments on 166,374 prompts, revealing wide variability in factual accuracy, sensitivity to wording changes, and the impact of decoder perturbations.

By Andrei Chetvergov, Mikhail Solovev, Timofei Sivoraksha, Stepan Ukolov, Valeriia Kuschenko, Alexander Evseev, Sergey Bolovtsov
arXiv AI
Sep 7

What Matters in On-Policy Distillation? A Perspective on Data Efficiency and Data Selection

The paper investigates data efficiency and selection in On‑Policy Distillation (OPD) for large language models. It shows that 1‑shot OPD—training on a single example—consistently improves performance, especially when the example is hard, and that longer chain‑of‑thought (CoT) paths drive the gains rather than token entropy. Based on these findings, the authors propose a simple hard‑example selection strategy that, using only eight carefully chosen hard examples, matches the performance of a 17,000‑example baseline across models from 1.5B to 7B parameters.

By Zhinan Hou, Jiaqi Zhang, Xunliang Cai, Keyou You
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Negative Self-Distillation: Learning to Reason by Avoiding Flaws

Negative Self-Distillation (NSD) is a new framework for improving large language models by encouraging them to diverge from their own flawed reasoning rather than imitate privileged solutions. Unlike On-Policy Self-Distillation, which can suppress uncertainty and exploratory behavior, NSD generates a question‑specific negative condition (e.g., a careless reasoner) and uses a dynamic gating mechanism to target only reasoning‑critical tokens for penalization. This approach preserves foundational language capabilities while consistently outperforming OPSD and other label‑free self‑bootstrapping reinforcement learning baselines.

By Rongcan Pei, Zhepei Wei, Shuyao Xu, Xinyu Zhu, Wei-Lin Chen, Yu Meng
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 10

Negative Self-Distillation: Learning to Reason by Avoiding Flaws

Negative Self-Distillation (NSD) is a new framework for improving large language models by encouraging them to diverge from their own flawed reasoning rather than imitate privileged solutions. Unlike On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD), which can suppress uncertainty and exploratory behavior, NSD generates a question‑specific negative condition (e.g., a careless reasoner) and pushes the student’s distribution away from it. A dynamic gating mechanism isolates reasoning‑critical tokens so that only behavioral flaws are penalized, preserving linguistic capabilities, and empirical results show NSD consistently outperforms OPSD and other label‑free self‑bootstrapping RL baselines.