arXiv:2609.36178v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a promising approach for training large language model agents. However, its uniform assignment o...
Matched-Context Group Policy Optimization (MCGPO) is a method for training long-horizon language model agents by constructing weighted action preferences from pre-collected trajectories. It defines comparison contexts using pre-action state summaries and rubric progress, and employs two-action support with exact and coarse matching rules to weight evidence for learning. Experiments across six environment-backbone settings show that MCGPO improves mean success rates over matched GraphGPO, achieving up to 5.16 percentage point gains on WebShop with Qwen3-4B and 8B models.
arXiv:2607. 13389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) post-training is increasingly used to adapt foundation models for reasoning, planning, and feedback-driven robot-learning pipelines, but constrained post-training resources are often summarized by a single total FLOP budget.
arXiv:2610.09679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adaptive rollout methods for group-relative reinforcement learning typically allocate a fixed per-update budget across prompts. We instead study how to...
arXiv:2606. 11119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for enhancing reasoning and agentic behavior in large language models.
arXiv:2610.07349v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) avoids a separate critic by estimating advantages from rollout groups. For multi-turn agents, however, traj...
MATCH is a closed‑loop framework for model‑aware tool learning that combines curriculum scheduling with hierarchically gated rewards. It introduces Model‑Aware Curriculum Learning (MACL), which dynamically adjusts sample difficulty based on reward signals, and Hierarchical Tool‑call Gated Reward (HTGR), which allocates credit at the tool name, argument key, and argument value levels only when prerequisites are met. Experiments on API‑Bank and BFCL V3 show MATCH achieving 72.19% and 62.87% overall accuracy, outperforming both supervised and RL‑based baselines across multiple backbone models.
arXiv:2607. 26253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is bottlenecked by rollout generation, yet many sampled prompts produce saturated groups (all responses correct or all incorrect) whose zero reward variance yields no policy-gradient signal.
arXiv:2610.19103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Group-based reinforcement learning enables large language model agents to learn from sparse outcome rewards in long-horizon tasks. Recent methods deriv...
arXiv:2606. 05885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon LLM agents require reinforcement learning methods that can assign credit to intermediate decisions under sparse and delayed rewards.
arXiv:2609.36864v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Group-relative methods for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) learn from differences in rollout outcomes. Independently sampling com...
arXiv:2610.15840v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language model (LLM) agents remains challenging in long-horizon tasks with sparse outcome rewards, where assign...