arXiv Machine Learning
CERO: Where and When to Allocate Rollouts for RL Post-Training
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5
Cross-Epoch Adaptive Rollout Optimization for RL Post-Training
arXiv:2606. 05606v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM post-training often relies on reinforcement learning methods that sample multiple rollouts per prompt, yet most existing approaches use a fixed rollout budget for every prompt, despite large differences in the training signal different prompts provide.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30
Early Verdicts, Better Budgets: Sequential Adaptive Rollout Allocation for Compute-Efficient RLVR
arXiv:2607. 26253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is bottlenecked by rollout generation, yet many sampled prompts produce saturated groups (all responses correct or all incorrect) whose zero reward variance yields no policy-gradient signal.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 16
Where Should RL Post-Training Compute Go? Model Size, Search, Learning, and Feedback
arXiv:2607. 13389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) post-training is increasingly used to adapt foundation models for reasoning, planning, and feedback-driven robot-learning pipelines, but constrained post-training resources are often summarized by a single total FLOP budget.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 13
PAIR: Pairwise-Aware Inclusion Reweighting for Adaptive Rollout Allocation in RLVR
arXiv:2608. 11368v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) spends most of its compute generating groups of long reasoning trajectories.
arXiv AI
4d ago
FSPO: Policy-Consistent Risk and Pareto-Feasible Control for Budgeted LLM RL Post-Training
arXiv:2610.02828v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adaptive LLM reinforcement-learning post-training changes multiple training actuators online, including rollout temperature, group size, clipping, KL r...
arXiv AI
Aug 19
Task Specialization Fine-Tuning for Contextual Reinforcement Learning
The paper introduces Task Specialization Fine-Tuning (TSFT), an online framework that allocates a limited fine‑tuning budget across multiple task regions in Contextual Reinforcement Learning. TSFT predicts fine‑tuning performance with a simple parametric model and solves the budget allocation problem exactly using integer linear programming. Experiments on combinatorial optimization, continuous control, and LLM fine‑tuning show that TSFT outperforms baselines in task coverage and approaches oracle performance.