arXiv AI

Seek Before You Move: Evidence Seeking for Progress Grounding in Vision-Language Navigation

SeekVLN is a new framework for Vision‑Language Navigation that addresses the problem of agents acting on insufficient evidence, termed Progress Myopia. It combines semantic progress reasoning with active evidence seeking, trained first with Future‑guided Reverse Generation to augment expert trajectories, and then refined via Counterfactual Contrastive Policy Optimization to reward beneficial seeking actions. Experiments on simulated benchmarks show significant gains, improving success rates by 12.7% on R2R‑CE and 7.5% on RxR‑CE, and real‑world tests demonstrate human‑like evidence‑seeking behavior.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 2

Path-level Hindsight Instructions for Semantic Exploration in Vision-Language Navigation

On-policy exploration is a crucial component for training robust Vision-Language Navigation agents, as it exposes the policy to a broader state distribution. However, such exploration inevitably leads to trajectories that deviate from expert demonstrations, resulting in a semantic mismatch between the executed visual stream and the original language instruction.

arXiv AI
Jun 30

CLOSER-VLN: Closed-Loop Self-Verified Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Aerial Vision-Language Navigation

arXiv:2606. 28397v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language navigation (VLN) has recently advanced with large language and multimodal models, enabling agents to follow natural-language instructions in unseen environments without training a task-specific navigation policy.

By Shaoxuan Li, Xiangyu Dong, Xiaoguang Ma, Junfeng Chen, Haoran Zhao, Yaoming Zhou
arXiv AI
1d ago

AVERT-VLN: Abstention-aware Visual Error Recovery and Training for Vision-and-Language Navigation

AVERT-VLN introduces a closed‑loop framework for vision‑and‑language navigation that incorporates an abstention‑aware Monitor to detect instruction‑execution inconsistencies. The Monitor is trained on a new LOSTNAV dataset of 20K counterfactual risk trajectories and fine‑tuned on 40K normal trajectories to recognize semantic deviations. During deployment, the Monitor can suspend autonomous navigation and request human guidance, while offline preference learning uses deviation‑associated failures to improve the policy, achieving 76.2% and 66.3% success on R2R‑CE and RxR‑CE unseen splits.

By Minrui Liu, Jingke Wang, Yuehao Huang, Hao Su, Jiajun Lv, Yukai Ma, Yong Liu
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 22

What do VLM-Based Vision-Language Navigation Models Rely on: Interpreting and Steering Policy Behavior

arXiv:2609.24576v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern Vision-Language Navigation (VLN) models rely mostly on pre-trained large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to predict navigation actions. While th...

By D\'ebora Oliveira Makowski, Samiran Gode, Abhijeet Nayak, Marco Hutter, Cordelia Schmid, Lukas Rosenberger Schmid, Wolfram Burgard