arXiv:2606. 16236v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) often suffers from performance degradation when deployed in environments that differ from those encountered during training.
By Ekasit Usaratniwart, Xilin Gao, Marc Ong, Youhei Akimoto
ActiveSaddler introduces automated curriculum learning for harness optimization, treating the evolving training curriculum as a non‑stationary bandit problem. It identifies reusable failure patterns, estimates learning progress for each, and balances revisiting known weaknesses with exploring new scenarios, allowing the curriculum to co‑evolve with the harness. Experiments on GAIA2 and Terminal‑Bench 2.0 show consistent improvements in harness performance, with Pass@1 gains of 4.4 and 7.5 percentage points over fixed‑order baselines.
By Sungho Park, Wonjoong Kim, Jue Zhang, Wook-Shin Han, Pengfei Gao, Chanyoung Park, Yongqiang Yao, Rao Fu, Elsie Nallipogu, Qingwei Lin, Victor R\"uhle
arXiv:2601. 19810v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unsupervised pre-training can equip reinforcement learning agents with prior knowledge and accelerate learning in downstream tasks.
By Octavio Pappalardo
arXiv:2607. 21971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time scaling through iterative self-evolution with environment feedback, as demonstrated by AlphaEvolve, shows remarkable performance gains.
By Shujin Wu, Cheng Qian, Xiusi Chen, Heng Ji
arXiv:2608.22549v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Batched simulators for autonomous driving have recently enabled training reinforcement learning (RL) agents at scale, encompassing thousands of traffic...
By Cevahir Koprulu, David Paz, Feng Tao, Yuliang Guo, Xinyu Huang, Ufuk Topcu, Liu Ren
The paper presents a theoretical framework comparing three evolutionary paradigms—Darwinian, Lamarckian, and agent-directed evolution—in the context of AI. It shows that when learning is effective, agent-directed evolution can accelerate adaptation by generating and evaluating behavioral variants, but this speed can also lead to convergence on misspecified objectives. The authors argue that independent evaluation and oversight are essential to ensure that AI’s self-directed improvements remain aligned with intended goals.
By Andrew W. Lo, Chaoyi Zhao
arXiv:2606. 03678v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generating safety-critical scenarios is essential for validating and improving autonomous driving systems, yet it inherently requires maximizing adversariality to expose failures while preserving realism.
By Tong Nie, Yuewen Mei, Yihong Tang, Junlin He, Jie Deng, Jian Sun, Wei Ma
COBRA‑Skills is a new framework that treats skill optimization for large language model agents as a budgeted sequential problem over a dynamically evolving candidate set. It uses contextual‑bandit prioritization to focus evaluations on promising or informative candidates and refines the skill population based on execution feedback. In experiments across six agent benchmarks and three target models, COBRA‑Skills outperforms existing methods, cuts optimization cost by 55–58 % compared to SkillOpt, and requires only 50 unique optimization examples per benchmark.
By Pingchen Lu, Xiangyi Wang, Xiang Li, Jie Mao, Zikun Qu, Junfeng Luo, Yao Shu, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, Zhongxiang Dai
The paper introduces Closed-Loop Aware Planning for Autonomous Driving (CLAP‑AD), a new planning head that learns a driving path via imitation while independently scoring candidate speeds using a learned function guided by safety constraints. Unlike traditional open‑loop imitation learning, CLAP‑AD allows explicit test‑time control over speed selection without requiring speed‑conditioned training. Experiments on Bench2Drive‑Speed, Bench2Drive, and NAVSIM v2 demonstrate significant improvements in speed‑adherence and overall driving performance compared to state‑of‑the‑art baselines.
By Emad Aghajanzadeh, Thomas Schwarzfischer, Marc Kaufeld, Moritz Thoma, Ryan P\'egoud, Manoj Rohit Vemparala, Pierpaolo Mori, Nael Fasfous, Johannes Betz, Daniel Mueller-Gritschneder, Ulf Schlichtmann
arXiv:2606. 20324v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Virtual training environments are software-intensive systems in which reinforcement learning (RL) agents learn, adapt, and demonstrate meaningful behavior.
By Xiaoran Liu, Istvan David
arXiv:2606. 30537v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous driving policies should be able to improve continually as deployment exposes them to increasingly diverse and long-tail traffic situations.
By Cheng Gong, Haoyang Wang, Chao Lu, Zirui Li, Jianwei Gong
arXiv:2510. 09041v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has demonstrated remarkable success in developing autonomous driving policies.
By Junchao Fan, Qi Wei, Ruichen Zhang, Yang Lu, Jianhua Wang, Xiaolin Chang, Bo Ai