arXiv:2602. 01177v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We develop an information-theoretic framework connecting stability, privacy, and generalization for quantum learning algorithms.
By Ayanava Dasgupta, Naqueeb Ahmad Warsi, Masahito Hayashi
arXiv:2606. 20344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models have scaled to unprecedented sizes, making training across distributed devices the de facto standard in the field.
By Mar\'ia Gragera Garc\'es, Lirand\"e Pira
We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown $n$-qubit state, but may keep only $k$ qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements.
arXiv:2607. 02444v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory.
By Srinivasan Arunachalam, Louis Schatzki
arXiv:2609.05702v2 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has shown rapid advances by utilizing quantum computing for machine learning tasks. Meanwhile, the privacy risks accom...
By Liou Tang, James Joshi, Ashish Kundu
arXiv:2606. 06531v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The critical question after a correct driving veto is not only whether a maneuver is unsafe, but whether the blocked interaction admits a lawful, auditable, and responsibility-bounded repair.
By Yifan Wang
arXiv:2607. 09632v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum information theory (QIT) characterizes the capabilities and fundamental limits of quantum information processing, underpinning quantum communication, computation, and error correction.
By Chengkai Zhu, Ziao Tang, Guocheng Zhen, Yimeng Cao, Yusheng Zhao, Ranyiliu Chen, Xuanqiang Zhao, Lei Zhang, Xin Wang
arXiv:2607. 05281v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Present-day quantum computing is cloud-based, where a user submits a circuit to a service provider's proprietary backend hardware.
By Ben Priestley, Mina Doosti
Given that quantum computers are naturally suited to simulate the behavior of quantum many-body systems, an immediate question arises: can one formulate physically motivated quantum machine learning (QML) tasks that exhibit learning separations? We address this problem by studying the learnability of quantum many-body dynamics from the perspective of probably approximately correct (PAC)-learning.
arXiv:2606. 29687v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We report a machine-verified resolution of a problem open for over a decade in quantum optimization: the Farhi, Goldstone and Gutmann (FGG) conjecture that depth-$p$ Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) on the ring of disagrees attains approximation ratio $(2p+1)/(2p+2)$ exactly.
By Uri Kol, Maor Ben-Shahar, Kfir Sulimany, Dirk Englund
The paper investigates whether having only forward access to a state-preparation unitary—without its inverse—can reduce the number of queries needed for quantum PAC learning. By analyzing worst-case scenarios over all compatible unitaries and finite dimensions, the authors prove that the optimal forward-only query complexities for realizable and agnostic learning are θ((d+log(1/δ))/ε) and θ((d+log(1/δ))/ε²), respectively, matching classical and quantum-copy bounds. These results demonstrate that forward-only access offers no asymptotic advantage over classical data or quantum copies, highlighting the essential role of inverse access for any improvement in the realizable setting.
By Natsuto Isogai, Satoshi Yoshida, Mio Murao
arXiv:2607. 06472v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Given that quantum computers are naturally suited to simulate the behavior of quantum many-body systems, an immediate question arises: can one formulate physically motivated quantum machine learning (QML) tasks that exhibit learning separations?
By Rahul Bandyopadhyay, Riccardo Molteni, Jens Eisert, Vedran Dunjko, Sofiene Jerbi