arXiv:2610.17192v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Routing problems, like the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP), are NP-hard and slow to solve for large...
By Barak Itzchak Davidovitch, Eli Meirom, Ethan Fetaya, Gal Chechik
arXiv:2602. 07216v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) trains fast heuristics for routing problems, but planners often need more than a single solve: they ask which stop to drop, which transition to preserve, or which subset of stops to remove if a route is infeasible.
By Reuben Narad, L\'eonard Boussioux, Michael Wagner
arXiv:2503. 03137v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Constructive neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) offers a promising paradigm for solving vehicle routing problems (VRPs) by directly learning to construct approximate optimal solutions, thereby reducing reliance on expert knowledge for algorithm design.
By Changliang Zhou, Xi Lin, Zhenkun Wang, Qingfu Zhang
The paper investigates why attention-based Pointer Networks, though size‑agnostic, lose performance when applied to different sized Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problems (CVRP). It identifies three causes—node‑density shifts, attention dispersion, and diluted graph context—and evaluates architectural changes on both encoder and decoder sides, including a learned permutation‑invariant graph‑context aggregation. The authors show that entropy‑based attention scaling improves large‑to‑small transfer, while the new aggregation methods best aid small‑to‑large transfer, and they combine these insights into a selector that chooses the optimal model for each train‑test size pair, reducing costs by up to 3.2% across seen and many unseen sizes.
By Sofiene Lassoued, Devara Tertia, Stefan Lier, Andreas Schwung
arXiv:2610. 00422v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural combinatorial optimization typically assumes a centralized solver that reads the whole instance.
By Johannes F. Loevenich, Thies Moehlenhof, Laurin Holz, Maxime Schwarzer, Tobias Huerten, Roberto Rigolin F. Lopes
arXiv:2608.28627v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Designing high-performance tactical wireless networks under realistic operational constraints gives rise to challenging combinatorial optimization prob...
By Wissem Ahmed Zaid, Alain Hertz, Defeng Liu
arXiv:2606. 22776v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Non-autoregressive neural solvers amortize computation across traveling salesman problem (TSP) instances, but models trained on random Euclidean instances can degrade when the number or spatial distribution of nodes changes.
By Xiang Li
arXiv:2610.27936v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) enable fast, flexible last-mile and emergency delivery, but their routing remains challenging as the number of clients...
By Sofiene Lassoued, Devara Tertia, Stefan Lier, Andreas Schwung
arXiv:2606. 01987v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We show that the Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) can be reformulated as a Graph Edit Distance (GED) maximization problem.
By Adel Dabah
arXiv:2608. 00908v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern network policy control maps intent to sequential placement-control decisions.
By Zuyuan Zhang, Vaneet Aggarwal, Tian Lan
arXiv:2608. 12146v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models for reinforcement learning (RL) couples two load-balancing problems: sequence composition determines dense attention work in each data-parallel microbatch, while token routing determines sparse expert work on expert-parallel ranks.
By Yibo Shen, Xudong Han, Xiaowei Zhu, Gen Li, Zhenxuan Pan
The paper investigates training‑free pruning of Mixture‑of‑Experts (MoE) models, focusing on how to handle the computation when a router selects a pruned expert. It compares replacement operators from three families on several models (OLMoE, DeepSeek‑V2‑Lite, Moonlight, Granite) while keeping the pruning mask fixed, and introduces a new operator called the tilted novice. The study finds that no single operator consistently dominates, with performance varying by model, pruning level, and evaluation metric, and it proposes a five‑item checklist for reporting results.
By Ezza Ali, Sehrish Bibi, Momina Moetesum, Faisal Shafait