arXiv Computer Vision

Extremely coarse learning objectives induce human-aligned representations in AI vision models

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

Alignment of visual brain encoding models with individual perceptual similarity judgments

The study explores how to fine‑tune visual brain encoding models so that their internal representations better match individual human perceptual similarity judgments. Using similarity data from 100 images collected from eight participants in the Natural Scenes Dataset, the authors adapted a generic similarity model (DreamSim) to create personalized perceptual similarity models for each subject. They then fine‑tuned each participant’s baseline encoder with either generic or personalized similarity information, finding that models trained with personalized judgments were most aligned with human perceptual similarity and preserved inter‑subject correlations of those judgments.

By Daniel Chong, Haomiao Chen, Keith W Jamison, Raja Marjieh, Ilia Sucholutsky, Nori Jacoby, Amy Kuceyeski
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Modeling The Object Representations Underlying Human Physical Reasoning

The study investigates how vision models represent objects compared to humans during physical reasoning tasks. By comparing segmentation outputs from several architectures (DINOv2, SegFormer, DeepLabV3+, UPerNet) to human behavior in time‑to‑collision and change‑detection tasks, the authors find that briefly trained models are too coarse, fully trained models are too fine, and an intermediate training stage best matches the coarse, volumetric bodies humans use. Larger models reach this intermediate alignment earlier, suggesting that resource constraints drive the emergence of human‑like representations in general‑purpose vision systems.

By Andrey Gizdov, Andrea Procopio, Lorenzo Caputi, Georgi I. Ivanov, Yichen Li, Daniel Harari, Tomer Ullman
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 12

Bridging Human and Model Attention: Explainability Analysis of CNN, Mamba, and ViT Architectures with Gaze-Based Validation

The paper presents a quantitative study of how well the attention maps of CNNs, Vision Transformers, and Vision Mamba align with human visual perception, using eye‑tracking data as ground truth. A standardized normalization pipeline maps attribution maps and gaze heatmaps to spatial probability distributions, and alignment is measured with Jensen‑Shannon similarity, Chi‑square similarity, and Pearson correlation across fine‑grained classification, medical imaging, and emotion recognition tasks. Results show that CNNs exhibit more global, diffuse saliency that generally matches human perception, ViTs focus on fine‑grained, patch‑level features, and Vision Mamba performs well in medical tasks but diverges in natural images, with architectural and training choices affecting interpretability.

By Marco Stefani, Edoardo Parpaiola, Matteo Bino, Gianluca Caregnato, Francesco Roncolato, Daniel Fusaro, Loris Nanni, Alberto Pretto
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

Diversity Without Labels: Task-Agnostic Coreset Selection Across Perception and Action

CoreDNA is an unsupervised, task‑agnostic coreset selection method that uses neuron activations from vision foundation models to build per‑image and per‑dataset distributions. By comparing each image’s distribution to the overall dataset distribution, it captures both low‑level visual structure and high‑level semantic information across layers, identifying high‑quality samples in the tails of the last layer’s activation statistics. The method achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance across image classification, semantic segmentation, depth estimation, and imitation learning for driving and mobile manipulation, demonstrating broad generalization without task‑specific tailoring.

By Julia Hindel, Benjamin Ramtoula, Kyuhwan Yeon, Nick Heppert, Paul Newman, Daniele De Martini, Abhinav Valada