arXiv:2602. 02016v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Shampoo is one of the leading approximate second-order optimizers: a variant of it has won the MLCommons AlgoPerf competition, and it has been shown to produce models with lower activation outliers that are easier to compress.
By Ionut-Vlad Modoranu, Philip Zmushko, Erik Schultheis, Mher Safaryan, Dan Alistarh
arXiv:2608. 16760v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable optimization is central to neural network (NN) training, yet Adam, the default optimizer for modern LLMs, rests on a fragile foundation.
By Yushun Zhang
arXiv:2607. 26247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tunes large pretrained models at a fraction of the cost of full fine-tuning, but its performance depends strongly on how the adapters are initialized.
By Dianze Liu, Farshid Ghezelbash
arXiv:2606. 00542v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Shampoo-style optimizers approximate gradient covariance matrices using Kronecker-factored structures.
By Bing Liu, Wenjie Zhou, Chengcheng Zhao
The article surveys recent neural‑network optimizers, noting that the field has moved beyond simple Adam variants to encompass matrix‑ and layer‑level designs, time‑policy horizons, and state representations that survive sharding and low‑precision computation. It categorizes optimizers along four axes—temporal estimation, update geometry, horizon management, and representation & systems—highlighting methods such as Muon, Shampoo, SOAP, and quantized states. The survey concludes that while matrix‑aware methods are a genuine advance, no single optimizer universally replaces AdamW, and performance depends on model scale, data‑to‑parameter ratio, batch size, schedule, partitioning, tuning budget, and target metric.
By Ruoran Xu
arXiv:2608.29448v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often face ill-conditioned objectives that limit high-accuracy training. Dense quasi-Newton methods improve...
By Guangyuan Wang, Mads Toftrup, Sebastian Loeschcke, Yixuan Wang, Anima Anandkumar
The paper presents an exact, information‑theoretic analysis of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and its variants, showing that a preconditioned SGD step corresponds to a posterior‑mean update in a Gaussian Bayes model. It decomposes one‑step regret into an intrinsic‑time cost and a change in comparator information, extending this split to an identity for the objective itself. The framework links convex convergence, saddle‑point escape, flatness‑generalization trade‑offs, learning‑rate schedules, adaptive optimizers, and various SGD variants, and it is validated on synthetic and real training runs, revealing how different optimizers achieve the same training loss through distinct step characteristics.
By Akshay Balsubramani
arXiv:2606. 13984v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Decision trees are one of the fundamental tools in statistical learning due to their interpretability, flexibility, and their ability to adapt to nonlinear structures.
By Mathias Bourel
arXiv:2508. 21022v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Subsampled natural gradient descent (SNG) has been used to enable high-precision scientific machine learning, but standard analyses based on stochastic preconditioning fail to provide insight into realistic small-sample settings.
By Gil Goldshlager, Jiang Hu, Lin Lin
The paper studies how different optimizers perform as training duration (overtraining) increases, focusing on matrix‑preconditioned methods (Muon, SOAP) and a momentum‑scheduled method (ADANA) compared to AdamW. Across models ranging from 51M to 253M parameters and overtraining factors up to 256×, the authors find that optimal learning‑rate schedules, weight‑decay coefficients, and memory settings shift with horizon, and that ADANA consistently outperforms AdamW, especially with log‑time weight decay and momentum cooldown. Muon and SOAP maintain roughly constant token‑efficiency advantages, with SOAP potentially improving at the highest overtraining levels.
By Katie Everett, Shikai Qiu
arXiv:2602. 02877v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper studies optimization for a family of problems termed $\textbf{compositional entropic risk minimization}$, in which each data's loss is formulated as a Log-Expectation-Exponential (Log-E-Exp) function.
By Xiyuan Wei, Linli Zhou, Bokun Wang, Chih-Jen Lin, Tianbao Yang
arXiv:2510.13210v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We compare Ising ({-1, +1}) and QUBO ({0, 1}) encodings for Boltzmann machine learning under controlled protocols that fix the sampler, optimizer,...
By Yasushi Hasegawa, Masayuki Ohzeki