The paper introduces Residual Advantage (RA), a new guidance method for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) that treats the teacher–student probability residual as a bounded one‑step reward, subtracts the student’s state value to form an advantage, and centers it within each response. RA preserves the verifier’s mean label while redistributing credit among response steps, and its extension CoRA updates the teacher model using verifier advantages to adapt guidance to the student’s attempts. Experiments with Qwen3 models show that RA combined with GRPO or REINFORCE++ consistently outperforms teacher‑only on‑policy distillation across three mathematical benchmarks, improving macro Avg@8 and Pass@8 scores, with CoRA providing additional gains.
By Xiaobing Chen, Zhiqi Pang
arXiv:2607. 26253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is bottlenecked by rollout generation, yet many sampled prompts produce saturated groups (all responses correct or all incorrect) whose zero reward variance yields no policy-gradient signal.
By Pixel Nomand, Elena Voss, Marcus Hale, Sofia Reyes
The paper proposes a reward‑density principle for language‑model post‑training: sparse sequence‑level rewards are best for exploring and discovering new behaviors in a strong teacher, while dense token‑level teacher supervision is optimal for compressing that behavior into a smaller deployment model. The authors validate this rule with a four‑stage workflow—teacher RL, forward‑KL warmup, on‑policy distillation, and optional post‑bridge student RL—showing that an RL‑improved 8B teacher distilled through a dense bridge outperforms direct GRPO on a 1.7B student across math and code benchmarks. Ablation studies confirm each stage’s contribution, and the approach generalizes to Llama and Qwen models, offering a practical guideline for allocating scarce labeled data.
By Yuanda Xu, Hejian Sang, Zhengze Zhou, Ran He, Zhipeng Wang, Alborz Geramifard
The paper introduces Zone of Proximal Policy Optimization (ZPPO), a method that keeps a teacher model inside prompts rather than in the policy gradient to improve knowledge distillation for small students. ZPPO creates two types of reformulated prompts—Binary Candidate-included Questions (BCQ) and Negative Candidate-included Questions (NCQ)—to expose students to correct and incorrect responses, and uses a replay buffer to focus training on hard questions until the student’s accuracy improves. Experiments on the Qwen3.5 family with a 27B teacher across 31 benchmarks show that ZPPO outperforms both off‑policy and on‑policy distillation methods, especially at the smallest student scales.
By Byung-Kwan Lee, Ximing Lu, Shizhe Diao, Minki Kang, Saurav Muralidharan, Karan Sapra, Andrew Tao, Pavlo Molchanov, Yejin Choi, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Ryo Hachiuma
arXiv:2607. 20543v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can improve one-sample accuracy while making a model worse under repeated sampling.
By Todd Zhou
arXiv:2608. 09836v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as a core component of modern LLM post-training pipelines, yet we reveal a failure mode: degenerate agreement, where students exploit repetitive loops to achieve near-perfect token agreement with the teacher despite globally flawed responses.
By Zichao Yu, Chengzhi Yu, Shengze Xu, Yujin Han, Bingqing Jiang, Xu Wang, Difan Zou
arXiv:2605. 17314v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider whether off-policy experience from a smaller, weaker model can elicit capability in a stronger learner that on-policy RL fine-tuning (e.
By Wei Deng
arXiv:2606. 18910v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time scaling via sequential revision has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning.
By Yuanxin Liu, Ruida Zhou, Xinyan Zhao, Amr Sharaf, Hongzhou Lin, Arijit Biswas, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Zhaoran Wang, Mingyi Hong
arXiv:2606. 15455v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a key approach for enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models.
By Suqin Yuan, Jinkun Chen, Jiyang Zheng, Muyang Li, Lei Feng, Dadong Wang, Tao Xiang, Tongliang Liu, Bo An
OPDSearch+ introduces a two‑stage distillation framework for search‑augmented reasoning that eliminates the need for task‑specific teacher fine‑tuning. In the first stage, a frozen off‑the‑shelf instruct model guides a student through live search interactions using a per‑position forward KL objective, transferring reasoning decomposition and evidence integration skills. The second stage refines this student with reinforcement learning, achieving performance surpassing RL alone and outperforming all prior 3B‑parameter baselines on seven QA benchmarks, including 13.1% improvement on HotpotQA and 8.5% on 2WikiMultihopQA.
By Qinglin Ye, Zhiyuan Gu, Jingjie Xia, Yiheng Zhang, Kaiyan Zhao, Shunchao Zheng, Yuhang Mu, Wenchao Du, Yiming Wang
arXiv:2607.28077v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models, but prompt groups with identica...
By Shuang Liang, Haoyang Zhou, Yifan Gong, Guowei Wang, Xiting Wang
arXiv:2608. 01522v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Teaching a language model a skill it has not mastered is obstructed by three recurring difficulties: training data is scarce, ground-truth reasoning traces are usually unavailable, and models often exhibit an apparent ceiling beyond which additional data yields no further improvement.
By Longtian Bao, Jianyou Wang, Yang Zhang, Youze Zheng, Ramamohan Paturi