arXiv AI

MA-Mesh: Resilient Multi-Agent Collaboration via Role-based Self-Healing

MA-Mesh is a framework that adds a role‑based self‑healing layer to multi‑agent collaboration patterns. It generates resilience‑aware system specifications and synthesizes them into executable policy code. The framework introduces cross‑agent reflection and role‑based failover to enable agents to evaluate peer performance and dynamically reassign roles, improving task performance and robustness in uncertain environments.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

WeClawArena: An Auditable Sandbox and Benchmark for Cross-User Agents Collaboration and Security in Human-Centered Agent Networks

arXiv:2608. 03499v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in persistent personal-agent frameworks are making human-centered agent networks realistic deployment targets: each user can be served by an AI agent that acts on the user's behalf, maintains state, and communicates with other agents through social and task relations.

By Prince Zizhuang Wang, Aojie Yuan, Haiyue Zhang, Xiyang Hu, Yue Zhao, Shuli Jiang
arXiv AI
1d ago

MASBench: Benchmarking LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration under Partial Observability

MASBench is a benchmark for evaluating large language model (LLM)-based multi‑agent systems (MAS) under partial observability, a realistic constraint where agents only see limited environmental information. The benchmark is structured into three progressive task categories—Reasoning, Scheduling, and Game—and assesses three collaboration mechanisms: Protocol, Memory, and Routing. It provides deterministic evaluation metrics such as performance score, communication cost, and cost effectiveness, and includes empirical results across various LLM backbones to guide effective MAS design.

By Qizhi Chu, Zekai Yu, Sijie Wen, Yang Liu, Chen Qian, Cheng Yang, Chuan Shi, Zhiyuan Liu
arXiv AI
6d ago

Goal-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Collaboration for Long-Horizon Tasks

The paper introduces Goal-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Collaboration (GAD), a framework that assigns distinct duties to separate agents with individualized contexts to tackle long-horizon tasks. It employs a growing execution graph to structure subtasks and their dependencies, ensuring each agent retains the original instruction, task goal, and acceptance conditions. GAD dynamically adapts collaboration and information sharing, using verification and recovery checks to monitor subtask results and overall task completion, providing feedback for repair when checks fail.

By Xu Shen, Lingyong Yan, Shuaiqiang Wang, Jianmin Wu, Zhikai Chen, Jiliang Tang, Jie Ren
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

WeClawArena: An Auditable Sandbox and Benchmark for Cross-User Agents Collaboration and Security in Human-Centered Agent Networks

Recent advances in persistent personal-agent frameworks are making human-centered agent networks realistic deployment targets: each user can be served by an AI agent that acts on the user's behalf, maintains state, and communicates with other agents through social and task relations. In these networks, everyday tool use becomes multi-party owned-agent collaboration over personal workspaces, where files, records, tools, and policies are not directly visible across owners.

arXiv AI
Oct 21

MAS-Guard: Unified Guardrails from Individual Agents to Multi-Agent LLM Systems

MAS-Guard is a unified framework designed to safeguard both single- and multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems. It introduces a local Agent Guardrail (A-Guard) layer that uses task-specific experts to evaluate agentic events, and a system-level Control Plane that applies deterministic structural checks and semantic assessments to routes, capabilities, and message content. The framework enforces interventions—allow, reflection, confirmation, and block—across benchmarks, reducing attack success rates by 71.5‑86.3% while maintaining utility on benign tasks.

By Mohammad Kachuee, Phu Mon Htut, Sheng Li, Nikolaos Pappas, Miguel Ballesteros Martinez, Yassine Benajiba, Sujith Ravi, Dan Roth
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Worse Together: How Performance Breaks Down in Multi-User Multi-Agent Teams

The paper investigates how coordination among AI agents serving different users degrades performance compared to a single coordinating agent. Across five advanced models and 77 scenarios in four shared-resource environments—API key budgets, clinic calendars, personal assistant bookings, and merge queues—the study finds that multi‑agent teams consistently underperform, sometimes collapsing entirely, and that even with communication channels coordination overhead remains significant. The authors identify specific failure modes such as stalling, action overriding, and claim fabrication, and propose environment‑specific mitigations like team leads and procedural instructions, while releasing the MAMUBench benchmark for future research.

By Sahan Paliskara, Nattaput Namchittai, Andrew Lampinen
arXiv AI
Oct 1

PANDA: A Decentralized Architecture with Flexible Orchestration for Scalable, Fault-Tolerant Multi-Agent Systems

PANDA is a decentralized architecture for large-scale, fault-tolerant multi-agent systems that enables heterogeneous agents to discover each other's capabilities and self-organize into specialized teams for each task. It decouples collective communication from team communication, allowing agents to participate in multiple teams simultaneously and load-balance tasks across the collective. PANDA supports three planning and execution patterns—star, chain, and mesh—detects and recovers from infrastructure and orchestration failures, and uses a web-of-trust model for governance without a central bottleneck.

By Matthew D. Laws, Cristina Nita-Rotaru
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 29

Goal-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Collaboration for Long-Horizon Tasks

The paper investigates how large language model agents handle long‑horizon tasks and finds that verification is crucial for success but often occurs too late. It shows that sharing a common context dilutes duty‑relevant information and that simply separating duties among agents is insufficient, as agents can lose sight of the overall goal. To address these issues, the authors propose Goal‑Aware Dynamic Multi‑Agent Collaboration (GAD), which uses an execution graph to organize subtasks, keeps each agent’s context focused on its specific goal, and dynamically adjusts task dependencies and information sharing based on execution evidence, with verification and recovery checks providing feedback for repair.