Query-conditioned vision--language models enable fine-grained interpretation by revealing how visual evidence changes with textual queries. However, evidence conditioned on complete descriptions does...
arXiv:2601.06847v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can generate convincing clinical narratives, yet frequently struggle to visually ground their statements. We po...
By Mengmeng Zhang, Xiaoping Wu, Hao Luo, Fan Wang, Yisheng Lv
arXiv:2608. 08021v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) should answer from concrete image evidence rather than language priors, dataset shortcuts, or irrelevant visual context.
By Haojie Huang, Xinlei Yu, Chengming Xu, Zhangquan Chen, Cheng Yang, Qingdong He, Yu Yang, Jiangning Zhang, Xiaobin Hu
arXiv:2608.29092v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) frequently generate content unsupported by visual inputs. Preliminary experiments show that visual evidence is pri...
By Sihang Jia, Shuliang Liu, Songbo Yang, Xuming Hu
arXiv:2607. 26107v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense vision-language understanding, including object localization, region recognition, and open-vocabulary semantic segmentation, requires associating language concepts with spatially grounded visual regions.
By Xinran Liu, Shouqian Shi, Yutong Chen, Ge Wang, Xin-Wei Yao, Sheng Zhong
EviViT is a lightweight attachment for pretrained vision transformers that learns where to focus detail in high‑resolution images. It uses human visual‑search traces to supervise a question‑conditioned evidence density, guiding regional re‑reading and efficient visual token allocation. The method connects regional features to the global scene via a sparse, coordinate‑aware bridge, improving fine‑grained accuracy across nine host models while using fewer tokens than global‑only processing.
By Yaoxin Niu, Zhangquan Chen, Yang Zhang, Xiang An, Zhumei Wang, Chih-Ting Liao, Hongkun Cao, Ruqi Huang
arXiv:2609.16795v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can answer knowledge-intensive visual questions by combining visual evidence from images with facts retrieved...
By Zhenbin Wang, Lei Zhang, Lituan Wang, Wei Huang, Yan Wang, Zhenwei Zhang
arXiv:2608.21796v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) aims to answer queries that necessitate reasoning over external knowledge sources beyond the visua...
By Long Shu, Shuochen Liu, Wei Chen, Junda Lin, Zhi Zheng, Huijun Hou, Tong Xu
arXiv:2608. 04496v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual inputs in vision-language models (VLMs) are often encoded into substantially longer token sequences than text, making visual tokens a major bottleneck for efficient inference.
By Chen Zhong, Xiao An, Zijie Wang, Jiepan Li, Guangyi Yang, Wei He
arXiv:2607. 07179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents.
By Miguel Lopez-Duran, Elena Marrero, Julian Fierrez, Marta Robledo-Moreno, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Daniel DeAlcala, Aythami Morales, Ruben Tolosana, Oscar Delgado, Alvaro Ortigosa, Javier Ortega-Garcia
SlideBank is a training‑free framework that turns each whole‑slide image into a persistent, concept‑indexed evidence bank. It performs coarse‑to‑fine exploration to locate informative regions and multi‑scale views, converts them into explicit morphological observations, and anchors pathology signals to the supporting patches and slide coordinates. During inference, questions are routed to relevant signals and evidence scales, and a confidence‑based cross‑level consensus integrates global, regional, and patch evidence, achieving high accuracy on WSI‑VQA and SlideBench‑BCNB while enabling consistent re‑phrasing and reduced inference cost.
By Beidi Zhao, Gexin Huang, Ciro Zhang, Anqi Li, Yusheng Tan, Chen Zhou, Gang Wang, Zu-hua Gao, Xiaoxiao Li
The paper introduces Visual Retrieval Heads (VRHs), a small fraction of attention heads in vision‑language models that are causally responsible for grounding text descriptions to image regions. By recasting head‑scoring methods and evaluating across eleven VLMs and five benchmarks, the authors show that masking the top 20 VRHs can drop grounding accuracy by up to 80 percentage points, while random masking has little effect. VRHs generalize across various visual reference tasks, preserve output format while corrupting localization, and transfer causally across models sharing an LLM backbone.
By Chanho Park, Daehyeon Choi, Jihyun Lee, Minhyuk Sung