arXiv:2609.16284v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Query-conditioned vision--language models enable fine-grained interpretation by revealing how visual evidence changes with textual queries. However,...
By Yan Zhu, Yongbo Chen, Zhengming Ding, Rebecca Faust
arXiv:2601.06847v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can generate convincing clinical narratives, yet frequently struggle to visually ground their statements. We po...
By Mengmeng Zhang, Xiaoping Wu, Hao Luo, Fan Wang, Yisheng Lv
arXiv:2608. 08021v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) should answer from concrete image evidence rather than language priors, dataset shortcuts, or irrelevant visual context.
By Haojie Huang, Xinlei Yu, Chengming Xu, Zhangquan Chen, Cheng Yang, Qingdong He, Yu Yang, Jiangning Zhang, Xiaobin Hu
arXiv:2608.29092v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) frequently generate content unsupported by visual inputs. Preliminary experiments show that visual evidence is pri...
By Sihang Jia, Shuliang Liu, Songbo Yang, Xuming Hu
EviViT is a lightweight attachment for pretrained vision transformers that learns where to focus detail in high‑resolution images. It uses human visual‑search traces to supervise a question‑conditioned evidence density, guiding regional re‑reading and efficient visual token allocation. The method connects regional features to the global scene via a sparse, coordinate‑aware bridge, improving fine‑grained accuracy across nine host models while using fewer tokens than global‑only processing.
By Yaoxin Niu, Zhangquan Chen, Yang Zhang, Xiang An, Zhumei Wang, Chih-Ting Liao, Hongkun Cao, Ruqi Huang
arXiv:2607. 26107v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense vision-language understanding, including object localization, region recognition, and open-vocabulary semantic segmentation, requires associating language concepts with spatially grounded visual regions.
By Xinran Liu, Shouqian Shi, Yutong Chen, Ge Wang, Xin-Wei Yao, Sheng Zhong
arXiv:2609.23534v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Language-based 3D localization retrieves the point-cloud submap containing a target position from descriptions of nearby objects and their spatial rela...
By Tianyi Shang, Yike Shi, Zhenyu Li
arXiv:2609.16795v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can answer knowledge-intensive visual questions by combining visual evidence from images with facts retrieved...
By Zhenbin Wang, Lei Zhang, Lituan Wang, Wei Huang, Yan Wang, Zhenwei Zhang
arXiv:2608.21796v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) aims to answer queries that necessitate reasoning over external knowledge sources beyond the visua...
By Long Shu, Shuochen Liu, Wei Chen, Junda Lin, Zhi Zheng, Huijun Hou, Tong Xu
arXiv:2607. 07179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents.
By Miguel Lopez-Duran, Elena Marrero, Julian Fierrez, Marta Robledo-Moreno, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Daniel DeAlcala, Aythami Morales, Ruben Tolosana, Oscar Delgado, Alvaro Ortigosa, Javier Ortega-Garcia
Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance in text-vision tasks, their robustness and transferability to different document domains remains underexplored.
The paper demonstrates that vision‑language models (VLMs) possess a small set of attention heads, called Visual Retrieval Heads (VRHs), that are causally responsible for linking text prompts to specific image regions. By adapting head‑scoring techniques from language models, the authors identify VRHs as the heads whose attention from output prediction tokens, summed over the ground‑truth referent region, most reliably indicates causal grounding. Experiments across eleven VLMs and five referring‑expression benchmarks show that masking the top 20 VRHs can drop grounding accuracy by up to 80 percentage points, while random masking has little effect, and that VRHs generalize across diverse visual tasks and transfer across models sharing an LLM backbone.