arXiv AI

A Survey of Transformer-based Language Models with Focus on Efficiency

The paper surveys Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) with a focus on efficiency, reviewing 312 articles that cover data curation, model design, downsizing, and dynamic inference. It also examines efficiency in adaptation strategies such as pre‑training, fine‑tuning, prompt‑engineering, and Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG). A statistical analysis and evaluation of over 30 prominent NLP models on 13 benchmarks provide insights into both efficiency and efficacy, highlighting trends toward sustainable NLP practices.

arXiv AI
Jun 29

POTracker: Optimizing Large Language Models for Standard-Compliant Power Outage Report Generation

arXiv:2606. 23533v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) are good at general text generation, but it is still hard to use them for domain-specific data generation because the output must follow strict formatting and structural rules.

By Hung Phan, Aniroop Naladala, Dubey Avanindra, Supryia Chinthavali, Lunga Dalton, Ali Jannesari
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

RePro: Training Language Models to Faithfully Recycle the Web for Pretraining

RePro is a web‑recycling technique that trains a small language model (as little as 1 B parameters) with reinforcement learning to produce high‑quality, faithful rephrasings of pretraining data. The method uses one quality reward and three faithfulness rewards to preserve core semantics and structure while converting organic data into better training examples. Experiments show that RePro boosts downstream accuracy by 3.7–14.5 % over organic‑only baselines and improves data efficiency 2–3×, outperforming prior prompting‑based recycling approaches.

By Zichun Yu, Chenyan Xiong
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 31

How Can We Synthesize High-Quality Pretraining Data? A Systematic Study of Prompt Design, Generator Model, and Source Data

arXiv:2604. 13977v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Synthetic data is a standard component in training large language models, yet systematic comparisons across design dimensions, including rephrasing strategy, generator model, and source data, remain absent.

By Joel Niklaus, Atsuki Yamaguchi, Michal \v{S}tef\'anik, Guilherme Penedo, Hynek Kydl\'i\v{c}ek, Elie Bakouch, Lewis Tunstall, Edward Emanuel Beeching, Thibaud Frere, Colin Raffel, Leandro von Werra, Thomas Wolf
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Squeezing More from Limited Data with Recursive Transformers

The paper investigates how to effectively pre‑train language models when the data budget is limited but compute is plentiful. It shows that increasing model size only improves performance up to an optimal point, after which overfitting degrades generalization, and that this optimal size varies with both the data budget and downstream tasks. To overcome the inefficiencies of standard Transformers in this regime, the authors propose recursive Transformers that reuse a shared block across depth and employ factorized embeddings, achieving better results than standard models on 10M–100M word pre‑training budgets and competitive performance with BabyLM Challenge 2025 winners.

By Serdar G\"ulbahar, Lukas Edman, Alexander Fraser
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Diverging Transformer Predictions for Human Sentence Processing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Agreement Attraction Effects

The study evaluates eleven autoregressive transformer models on English agreement attraction scenarios using a surprisal-based approach. Results show that while transformers match human reading times for prepositional phrase configurations, they perform poorly on object‑extracted relative clauses, with predictions diverging across models and failing to capture human interference patterns. The authors argue that current transformers cannot adequately model human morphosyntactic processing and call for more rigorous, comprehensive testing to avoid misleading conclusions from limited syntactic setups.

By Titus von der Malsburg, Sebastian Pad\'o