arXiv AI

ChannelGuard: From Borrowed Safety to Application-Controlled Defenses in Multi-Agent LLMs

ChannelGuard introduces an application‑controlled defense that inspects information at every handoff between models in multi‑agent LLM systems, eliminating the need for extra training or model calls. In over 5,700 test runs across five agent models, it stopped all attacks hidden in tool outputs, and on two open models it reduced successful prompt attacks from 80% to 3% and from 77% to 10%, without affecting accuracy on 30 math problems. The study shows that safety scores can mask very different underlying protections, and that relying solely on model or provider filters may be risky if either changes.

arXiv AI
Oct 7

Where Rules End and Judges Begin: Measuring the Judgment Boundary in Multi-Agent Systems Security

The paper introduces DEFER1, a deterministic-first enforcement system for large‑language‑model based multi‑agent systems that uses 28 checks to block most attacks and refers only a small fraction to human judges. In tests across four domains, DEFER1 reduces attack success from about 30% to roughly 3%, with 78% of attacks blocked deterministically and only a quarter reaching the judges. The study highlights that rules effectively handle clear policy violations while judges address ambiguous intent, but also reveals weaknesses such as a risk‑score gate that misclassifies many proposals.

By Shaswata Mitra, Raj Patel, Subash Neupane, Sudip Mittal, Md Rayhanur Rahman, Shahram Rahimi
arXiv AI
Oct 21

MAS-Guard: Unified Guardrails from Individual Agents to Multi-Agent LLM Systems

MAS-Guard is a unified framework designed to safeguard both single- and multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems. It introduces a local Agent Guardrail (A-Guard) layer that uses task-specific experts to evaluate agentic events, and a system-level Control Plane that applies deterministic structural checks and semantic assessments to routes, capabilities, and message content. The framework enforces interventions—allow, reflection, confirmation, and block—across benchmarks, reducing attack success rates by 71.5‑86.3% while maintaining utility on benign tasks.

By Mohammad Kachuee, Phu Mon Htut, Sheng Li, Nikolaos Pappas, Miguel Ballesteros Martinez, Yassine Benajiba, Sujith Ravi, Dan Roth
arXiv AI
Jun 18

SafeClawBench: Separating Semantic, Audit-Evidence, and Sandbox Harm in Tool-Using LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 18356v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using language-model agents introduce security failures that go beyond unsafe text: they can disclose protected objects, write persistent memory, send messages, modify databases, or trigger harmful code and tool effects.

By Yuchuan Tian, Mengyu Zheng, Haocheng Mei, Ye Yuan, Chao Xu, Xinghao Chen, Hanting Chen, Yu Wang
arXiv AI
Jun 2

AgentRedBench: Dynamic Redteaming and Integration-Aware Defense for LLM Agents over SaaS Integrations

arXiv:2606. 02240v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Indirect prompt injection in tool-use agents is a concrete production threat: LLM agents read from integrations (third-party services such as Gmail, Salesforce, or Jira accessed through tool calls) whose response content the user neither writes nor controls.

By Hiskias Dingeto, Will Leeney
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

NetInjectBench: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injection in Tool-Using Large Language Model Agents for Network Operations

arXiv:2607. 10490v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using large language model (LLM) agents are attractive for network operations, but tickets, alerts, logs, runbooks, and ChatOps messages can carry indirect prompt injections.

By Ruksat Khan Shayoni, Muhammad Faraz Shoaib, S M Asif Hossain, M. F. Mridha
arXiv AI
Jun 12

PI-Hunter: Automated Red-Teaming for Exposing and Localizing Prompt Injections

arXiv:2606. 12737v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving into agentic systems that interact with external tools and environments, introducing new security risks such as indirect prompt injection attacks through untrusted external sources.

By Pengfei He, Lesly Miculicich, Vishesh Sharma, Ash Fox, George Lee, Jiliang Tang, Tomas Pfister, Long T. Le