The paper introduces a weakly supervised framework for extracting dataset mentions from forced displacement and Fragile, Conflict, and Violence (FCV) documents. It uses a lightweight model trained on general research literature to generate candidate mentions, which are then refined by a large language model that validates or rejects them and corrects boundaries. The refined annotations are augmented with synthetic and contrastive examples to fine‑tune the model, achieving 74.1% precision and 70.5% recall on a benchmark of 1,706 passages, with higher precision (89.5%) on passages that contain dataset references.
By Rafael Macalaba, Aivin V. Solatorio, Patrick Michael Brock, Olivier Dupriez
arXiv:2606. 27047v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of tasks, but ensuring their reliability in highly technical domains remains a significant challenge.
By Henry Shaowu Yuchi, Michal Kucer, Benjamin H. Sims, Selma Peterson, Emily Taylor
MiST (Mid-trained Security Transformer) is a suite of 8B and 32B language models tailored for cybersecurity, achieving strong performance on public benchmarks. The approach uses a mid-training stage that adapts general pre-trained models to the domain by curating a compact, expert-vetted seed corpus and generating high-quality synthetic training data, rather than continual pre-training on large raw text. MiST checkpoints improve mean cybersecurity accuracy by +13.1 and +8.6 absolute percentage points over Qwen baselines for 8B and 32B models, respectively, and provide a stronger initialization for downstream task-specific fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
By Oded Ovadia, Elad Ben Zaken, Elad Guttman, Orly Moreno Kadosh
arXiv:2601. 22146v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Due to limited supervised training data, large language models (LLMs) are typically pre-trained via a self-supervised "predict the next word" objective on a vast amount of unstructured text data.
By Ajay Patel, Colin Raffel, Chris Callison-Burch
MoPrO‑SD is a stance‑specific prompt optimization framework that breaks prompts into semantic modules and refines them sequentially with LLM feedback. It evaluates three refinement strategies—instruction‑only, instruction with reasoning, and instruction with per‑example reasoning—using class‑conditioned errors to improve stance detection. The authors also release VaccineStance, a new human‑annotated benchmark for vaccine stance detection, and demonstrate that MoPrO‑SD outperforms human‑written base prompts across multiple datasets and open‑weight LLMs.
By Meysam Sabbaghan, Nikesh Gyawali, Arman Zareian Jahromi, Sebastian Loera-Lozano, Doina Caragea, Cornelia Caragea
arXiv:2609.37891v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Current pre-training datasets are derived from web crawls, with all their issues, and were not designed to support mid- and post-training pipelines--...
By Pierre-Carl Langlais, Pieter Delobelle, Yannick Detrois, Pavel Chizhov, Carlos Rosas-Hinostroza, Neil Si Smail, Benjamin Burtin, Hanna Shcharbakova, Ivan Yamshchikov, Anastasia Stasenko
arXiv:2607. 17524v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose Token-Level Off-Policy Labeling (TOPL), an off-policy training paradigm that reframes post-training as a token-level correctness prediction task.
By Zitong Huang, Gustavo Lucas Carvalho, Deqing Fu, Robin Jia
Strategic Doctrine Language Models (sdLM) are a learning‑system framework that integrates multi‑document attention, temporal encoding, and a doctrine‑consistency layer to enable multi‑document strategic reasoning with doctrinal consistency constraints and calibrated uncertainty. The authors evaluate sdLM on expert‑panel scoring of 47 strategic scenarios, doctrine consistency across 336 doctrine publications (12,847 statements), and geopolitical forecasting on 127 historical counterfactuals spanning 1945‑2020 over 12‑60 month horizons, showing higher strategic quality and better calibration than strong general‑purpose LLM baselines and competitiveness with human experts on long‑horizon judgments. Ablation studies, scaling trends, and deployment‑oriented performance/latency characteristics are reported to identify which components drive improvements and how they translate to operational settings.
By Olaf Yunus Laitinen Imanov, Taner Yilmaz, Derya Umut Kulali
arXiv:2606. 15396v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Malicious content generated from large language models (LLMs) could pose severe safety risks and ethical concerns.
By Wenbo Yu, Bohua Wang, Hao Fang, Kuofeng Gao, Jingru Zeng, Xiaochen Yang, Tianyi Zhang, Xiaoxiao Ma, Jiawei Kong, Hao Wu, Bin Chen, Shu-Tao Xia, Min Zhang
arXiv:2607. 02079v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present HaloGuard 1.
By Navaneeth Sangameswaran, Preetham S, Ashmiya Lenin
The paper evaluates open‑source large language models (LLMs) for both flat and nested named entity recognition (NER) tasks, comparing them to traditional encoder‑based models and decoder‑based LLMs using in‑context learning. It shows that with parameter‑efficient fine‑tuning and structured output formats (e.g., inline brackets or XML), LLMs can match or exceed the performance of conventional NER systems, and that their NER abilities arise from instruction following rather than memorization. Additionally, fine‑tuning for NER minimally affects, and can even improve, the LLMs’ general capabilities on other benchmarks.
By Qi Zhan, Yile Wang, Hui Huang
The paper presents a framework that combines human-curated vocabularies with a few human-written exemplars to enable large language models (LLMs) to generate coherent text in extremely low-resource or unseen languages. By sampling candidate words from a Zipfian distribution and providing syntactic signals, the method achieves fluent sentence-level generation and promising paragraph-level results across languages with varying resource levels. The study evaluates output quality using lexical diversity, off-target ratio, and human fluency judgments, demonstrating that reasoning-enabled LLMs can effectively bootstrap synthetic data even when digital resources are scarce.
By Michael Christlambert Sinanta (Independent Researcher), Muhammad Dehan Al Kautsar (Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence), Amanda Nurul Izzah (Independent Researcher), Thanh-Nhi Nguyen (Independent Researcher), Phan Phuong Mai Chau (Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence), Zheng Wei Lim (University of Amsterdam), Fajri Koto (Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence)