arXiv AI

Vision: "What Don't I Know About User's Preferences?" How Uncertainty Estimation Improves Proactive Assistant Alignment

arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago

Adaptive Personalization Under Preference Epistemic Uncertainty

The paper introduces the concept of adaptive personalization under preference epistemic uncertainty, arguing that conversational AI must adjust its response strategy as human preferences evolve. A study shows people prefer state‑contingent strategies when uncertainty changes, and the authors build a multilingual benchmark to test language models on this task. Results reveal a recognition‑generation gap: models can choose the right strategy from options but fail to generate it correctly, defaulting to exploit‑first behavior; targeted training on internal strategy representations improves performance on out‑of‑distribution personas.

By Priyanka Dey, Rajarshi Das, Vikas Bahirwani, Qi Zeng, Julia Kruk, Qi Qi
arXiv AI
Jul 17

Align AI to Dynamic Human-AI Workflows

arXiv:2607. 14240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current alignment approaches typically focus on emulating human behavior using static representations of human preferences, failing to capture the dynamic, context-dependent nature of real-world human-AI interactions.

By Valerie Chen, Cleotilde Gonzalez, Anita Williams Woolley, Michael Lee, Tongshuang Wu, Vincent Conitzer, Aarti Singh
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Active Client Selection in Federated Trajectory Prediction with Uncertainty-Awareness and Heterogeneous Complexity

The paper introduces active client selection strategies for federated learning in autonomous vehicle trajectory prediction, addressing challenges of high scene uncertainty and heterogeneous complexity across different driving environments. It proposes uncertainty-aware selectors that use per-client negative log-likelihood and aleatoric uncertainty, as well as a joint selector that balances scene complexity and uncertainty to prioritize informative clients. Experiments on the Argoverse dataset show that federated models outperform local training, with uncertainty-aware selection speeding convergence and improving key metrics, while the joint selector yields the best generalization under strong heterogeneity.

By Yiming Xie, Muzi Peng, Fei Miao, Ningfang Mi, Lili Su
arXiv AI
Oct 2

NextMe-800: Anticipating Personal Behavior from Months of Egocentric Video

NextMe-800 is an approximately 800‑hour first‑person video dataset collected from a single volunteer over 126 days, featuring 1 Hz images, gaze, and audio. The data are captioned at five hierarchical abstraction levels—from atomic actions to major activities—enabling personalized action anticipation as an open‑vocabulary K‑step sequence prediction task. The authors also introduce NextAct, a 1,500‑point benchmark that combines NextMe‑800 with the multi‑person EgoLife dataset, and evaluate models using an embedding‑based soft edit distance to assess how well personal behavior can be anticipated across abstraction levels and prediction horizons.

By Zhaoxu Meng, Yiming Sun, Mingyuan Gao, Jiachang Zhang, Zhuhan Dai, Yipeng Du, Zheng Lian, Jian-Qiao Zhu
arXiv AI
2d ago

Multi-Resident Data Association in Smart Homes via MDP Modeling and Behavior Cloning

The paper introduces a new framework for multi-resident data association in smart homes, framing the problem as a Markov Decision Process and solving it with Behavior Cloning. Two policy architectures are proposed: a lightweight Transformer treating association as multi-label classification over event histories, and a fine-tuned Large Language Model that generates conditional text to leverage semantic knowledge. Experiments on three datasets show the approach outperforms existing baselines, especially for concurrent multi-resident events, and the LLM policy hints at cross-environment transfer potential.

By Xi Chen (M-PSI), Julien Cumin (LIG, M-PSI), Fano Ramparany (LIG, M-PSI), Dominique Vaufreydaz (LIG, M-PSI)
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 19

Quantifying Aleatoric Uncertainty of In-Context Learning for Robust Measure of LLM Prediction Confidence

arXiv:2606. 19353v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In-Context Learning (ICL) allows LLMs to adapt to new tasks from a few demonstrations, but its reliability remains a concern: predictions are highly sensitive to both prompt design and the model's ability to understand the context, obscuring whether failures arise from data properties or model limitations.

By Jinseok Chung, Minkyoung Song, Hyunji Jung, Namhoon Lee