Hugging Face Trending Papers

UFPR-PEs: A Brazilian Face Recognition Benchmark with Self-Declared Race/Color Labels

arXiv Computer Vision
3d ago

DenseFace: Bias Mitigation in Face Recognition via Density-Aware Probabilistic Matching

DenseFace introduces a bias‑mitigation technique for face recognition that operates on pre‑trained models without retraining. It models each person’s face embeddings with a von Mises‑Fisher distribution and uses a density‑aware probabilistic matching procedure to account for demographic differences. Experiments show that DenseFace consistently reduces racial bias across various architectures and datasets while preserving recognition accuracy.

By Mansur Bultygov, Vadim Seliutin, Dmitry Nekhaev, Ivan Laptev
arXiv AI
Jun 4

CounterFace: A Synthetic Face Dataset for Fine-Grained Counterfactual Evaluation of Face Recognition Systems

arXiv:2407. 13922v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Face recognition (FR) systems are widely deployed in critical applications, making their reliability and robustness across diverse populations and conditions essential.

By Guruprasad Viswanathan Ramesh, Ashish Hooda, Shimaa Ahmed, Harrison J Rosenberg, Ramya Korlakai Vinayak, Kassem Fawaz
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

Learning Late, Guiding Early: Timestep-Decoupled Semantic Guidance for Fair Face Generation

The paper introduces Semantic Boundary Predictor (SBP), an inference‑time framework that improves demographic fairness in synthetic face generation by applying a single, one‑shot intervention during reverse denoising. SBP learns linear semantic boundaries from late‑stage latent representations and applies them only at the initial noisy latent, leaving the rest of the diffusion process unchanged. Experiments on CelebA‑HQ show significant reductions in fairness disparity—98% for gender, 95% for binary race, and 15% for four‑class race—while preserving image quality across demographic groups.

By Subir Kumar Parida, Rajbabu Velmurugan, Ketan Kotwal, R. S. Sengar, Swati Hiremath
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

FairLens: Benchmarking Fairness in Vision-Language Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making

FairLens is a benchmark and evaluation framework that measures fairness and validity of vision‑language models (VLMs) in high‑stakes domains such as hiring, legal, and healthcare. It uses over 100,000 face‑image and question pairs covering gender, race, and age, and assesses responses through demographic parity, soundness, demographic association, and bias in free‑text generation. The study finds that VLMs often make unwarranted inferences from faces rather than abstaining, especially in legal and healthcare contexts, and that small parity gaps can still hide unsafe treatment across groups.

By Vahid Reza Khazaie, Ahmed Y. Radwan, Shaina Raza