arXiv Machine Learning
FairLens: Benchmarking Fairness in Vision-Language Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 24
Unlearning Under Imbalance: Benchmarking Fairness in Multimodal LLM Unlearning
arXiv:2607. 21300v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine unlearning has emerged as a tool for removing personal data from trained models to comply with recent AI regulations.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
Mitigating Bias in Large Vision-Language Models via Counterfactual Ensemble Decoding
arXiv:2608.21415v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks; however, they often inherit social biases fro...
arXiv Computer Vision
3d ago
Guardrail-Agnostic Societal Bias Evaluation in Large Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2608.29590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose a societal bias evaluation method for large vision-language models (LVLMs) in the era of strong safety guardrails. Existing benchmarks rely...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 1
WIDER-FAIR: An Annotated Version of the WIDER-FACE Dataset for Fairness Evaluation
arXiv:2606. 31704v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The deployment of face detection models in real-world applications raises important fairness concerns, as these systems may showcase performance disparities across demographic groups.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 10
CIFA: Contextual-Intersectional Fairness Auditing for Hidden Subgroup Discovery in Face Analysis
Fairness evaluation in computer vision commonly relies on aggregate accuracy and demographic subgroup analysis. However, visual models are also sensitive to contextual factors such as illumination, blur, image quality, facial accessories, and appearance attributes.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9
Exposing Hidden Biases in Text-to-Image Models via Automated Prompt Search
arXiv:2512. 08724v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Text-to-image (TTI) diffusion models have achieved remarkable visual quality, yet they have been repeatedly shown to exhibit social biases across sensitive attributes such as gender, race and age.