Hugging Face Trending Papers

REWIND: Uncertainty-Guided Trajectory Repair for Test-Time Reasoning

arXiv AI
Aug 26

Selective Regenerative Decoding: Trajectory-Level Intervention for Inference-Time Reasoning

Selective Regenerative Decoding (SRD) is a new inference-time decoding method that improves large language model reasoning by allowing segment-level intervention on candidate trajectories. Instead of discarding or keeping entire trajectories, SRD selectively refines only the degraded suffix while preserving useful prefixes, leading to higher expected trajectory quality and better sample efficiency. Experiments on MATH500, GPQA Diamond, HotpotQA, and AlpacaEval show that SRD matches Best-of-N accuracy with fewer generated tokens and outperforms speculative rejection in low‑compute settings.

By Sophia Xiao Pu, Yumo Xu, Sailik Sengupta, Millennium Bismay, Ruixue Lian, James Gung, Yi-an Lai, Arshit Gupta
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 17

Learning from Your Own Mistakes: Constructing Learnable Micro-Reflective Trajectories for Self-Distillation

Self-distillation improves reasoning in large language models by using the model's own rollouts as training signal, typically through implicit logit-level alignment that minimizes KL divergence toward a privileged target distribution. However, because this supervision is generated via uncontrolled sampling, it provides no diagnostic insight into the model's specific errors or corrective guidance for its individual failure patterns.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18

Learning from Your Own Mistakes: Constructing Learnable Micro-Reflective Trajectories for Self-Distillation

arXiv:2606. 18844v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-distillation improves reasoning in large language models by using the model's own rollouts as training signal, typically through implicit logit-level alignment that minimizes KL divergence toward a privileged target distribution.

By Zhilin Huang, Hang Gao, Ziqiang Dong, Yuan Chen, Yifeng Luo, Chujun Qin, Jingyi Wang, Yang Yang, Guanjun Jiang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Stable-MM-R1: Anchoring Multimodal Reasoning Dynamics via Entropy-Guided Stratification

The paper introduces Stable-MM-R1, a framework that stabilizes reinforcement learning for multimodal reasoning by addressing training instability and entropy collapse. It proposes Potential‑Aware Query Mining (PAQM) to filter data toward high‑potential samples and Hybrid Stratified Replay (HSR) to restructure batches using path entropy and reward stratification, reusing stability anchors and hard negatives. The method demonstrates superior performance on complex reasoning tasks compared to strong baselines.

By Yimeng Ye, Shuang Chen, Wenxuan Huang, Manyuan Zhang, Kaituo Feng, Zhangquan Chen, Jiayu Chen, Yucheng Zhou, Yicheng Xiao, Zhiyuan Feng, Tianyu Shi
arXiv AI
Oct 9

Balancing Reference Guidance and Free Generation in Trajectory Rollouts for Reasoning RL

The paper introduces Adaptive Reference Guidance (ARG), a method that balances using a verified reference solution with free generation in trajectory rollouts for reasoning reinforcement learning. ARG selects a prefix of the reference to guide the model, continuing from it only if the resulting trajectory passes verification, otherwise falling back to the reference. Experiments on Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that ARG achieves the highest aggregate pass@12 while maintaining competitive average sampled accuracy.

By Hanyu Wang, Nakul Agarwal, Hossein Nourkhiz Mahjoub, Ehsan Moradi Pari, Makoto Fukushima, Jinghui Chen, Vaishnav Tadiparthi
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 15

Entropy-Preserving Supervised Fine-Tuning via Adaptive Self-Distillation for Large Reasoning Models

arXiv:2602. 02244v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The standard post-training recipe for large reasoning models, supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning (SFT-then-RL), may limit the benefits of the RL stage: while SFT imitates expert demonstrations, it often causes overconfidence and reduces generation diversity, leaving RL with a narrowed solution space to explore.

By Hao Wang, Hao Gu, Hongming Piao, Kaixiong Gong, Yuxiao Ye, Xiangyu Yue, Sirui Han, Yike Guo, Dapeng Wu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Reflective Recovery: A Self-Supervised Method for Reasoning by Learning from Mistakes

Reflective Recovery is a self‑supervised method that turns failed reasoning attempts into training data, enabling large language models to learn how to correct mistakes during inference. By extracting initial segments of erroneous trajectories and using them as prompts, the approach teaches models to recognize and recover from errors without external critics. Experiments show significant accuracy gains on benchmarks such as AIME 2025 and Minerva, and the method overcomes the scaling collapse problem, fostering emergent self‑correction behaviors.

By Qirui Chen, Renjie Pi, Jiahui Gao, Lingpeng Kong