arXiv AI By Lingyu Jiang, Zirui Li, Lingyu Xu, Shuo Xing, Peiran Li, Tsubasa Takahashi, Dengzhe Hou, Zhengzhong Tu, Kazunori Yamada, Fangzhou Lin

PathCal: State-Aware Reflection-Marker Calibration for Efficient Reasoning

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

Reasoning Models Don't Just Think Longer, They Move Differently

arXiv:2605. 15454v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reasoning-trained language models often spend more tokens on harder problems, but longer chains of thought do not show whether a model is merely computing for more steps or following a different internal trajectory.

By Anders Gj{\o}lbye, Lars Kai Hansen, Sanmi Koyejo
arXiv AI
Sep 7

Towards Understanding Pause Token Fine-Tuning Dynamics: A Mode Retention Perspective

The paper investigates how pause tokens affect fine‑tuning dynamics rather than just inference performance. Experiments on synthetic continual‑learning and math‑reasoning tasks show that masked pause tokens (MBP) reduce overwriting of learned modes and compress downstream‑step information. Across 1B‑8B Qwen and Llama models, MBP consistently improves reasoning scores while preserving language understanding, and the approach also benefits GRPO.

By Jaehyeon Kim, Suhwan Kim, Nakyung Lee, Yeongoon Kim, Jimin Seo, Giho Lee, Jungwoo Lee
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

TRACES: Tagging Reasoning Steps for Adaptive Cost-Efficient Early-Stopping

TRACES (Tagging Reasoning Steps for Adaptive Cost‑Efficient Early‑Stopping) is a lightweight framework that tags reasoning steps of large‑language models in real time, enabling adaptive, cost‑efficient early stopping during inference. By monitoring the types of steps generated, the method identifies when models shift their reasoning after arriving at a correct answer, allowing for interpretable stopping criteria. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks (MATH500, GSM8K, AIME) and knowledge benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA) show token reductions of 20–50% while preserving accuracy, with more conservative thresholds needed for harder tasks such as BeyondAIME and IMO AnswerBench.

By Yannis Belkhiter, Seshu Tirupathi, Giulio Zizzo, John D. Kelleher
arXiv AI
Jun 15

Fractured Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

arXiv:2505. 12992v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time scaling techniques have significantly bolstered the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by harnessing additional computational effort at inference without retraining.

By Baohao Liao, Hanze Dong, Yuhui Xu, Doyen Sahoo, Christof Monz, Junnan Li, Caiming Xiong
arXiv AI
Sep 4

</think> Doesn't Stop Reasoning: Analysis of Spurious CoT Termination

The paper investigates a training‑free early‑exit technique that inserts an end‑of‑think (EoT) token to terminate chain‑of‑thought (CoT) reasoning in large reasoning models. It finds that the injected EoT often fails to cleanly switch the model from reasoning to answering, leading to continued reasoning‑like generation—termed spurious CoT termination—whose length scales with the amount of reasoning saved. By increasing attention to the EoT token through Exit‑token Attention Biasing (EAB), the authors reduce spurious termination and shorten the answering phase across multiple models and benchmarks.

By Seunghee Koh, Sungjae Choi, Minchan Kwon, Sunghyun Baek, Junmo Kim